Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest banner
1 - 20 of 25 Posts

· Pew pew!
Joined
·
18,182 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
http://jeremysarber.com/2009/07/29/the-truth-behind-snopes-com/

When I saw that Snopes had falsely claimed that Obama’s Birth Certificate had been properly validated, I realized something was wrong with either their research and/or their credibility. It seems something is seriously wrong with both.
Then a few months ago, when my State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the Internet,
Supposedly the Mikkelsons claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort ever took place.
I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this, and I gave him Bud Gregg’s contact phone numbers. Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec’s at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg no one from snopes.com ever contacted anyone with State Farm. Yet snopes.com issued a statement as the ‘final factual word’ on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things. Not!
Then it has been learned the Mikkelsons are very Democrat and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism lately over the
Internet with people pointing out the Mikkelsons liberalism revealing itself in their web site findings.
Gee, what a shock!
So, I say this now to everyone who goes to www.snopes.com to get what they
think to be the bottom line facts: Proceed with caution. Take what it says at face value and nothing more. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself.
Plus, you can always Google a subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that’s all the Mikkelsons do. After all, I can personally vouch from my own experience for their ‘not’ fully looking into things.
 

· Get Up and Go
Joined
·
2,575 Posts
Interesting, Sarber posts the whole e-mail that tries to make Snopes look bad, but then posts only a little of the Factcheck report.

I read them all.

A self identified Baptist Conservative would seem to be the type of person with a persona agenda in writing his opinions. And on this subject he does not actually post his opinion, but asks the reader to decide who to believe, again by posting all of one side and very little of the other side.
We all know most people won't read beyond that, and with what was posted I can see people believing what is being implied in the e-mail.

But when you look further at the Snopes and Factcheck articles you will find a State Farm spokesperson being quoted. It would seem easy enough to verify this persons statement.

After looking at all of it I can not say that I believe the e-mail.


http://www.factcheck.org/2009/04/snopescom/
 

· Registered
Joined
·
10,491 Posts
And the truth comes about snopes.com just as I have stated earlier,(in the thread)that what snopes posts at face value. Also as stated snopes has a liberal agenda and would not think of saying or quoting anything conservative as that may make liberals look one sided, or left leaning
 

· Get Up and Go
Joined
·
2,575 Posts
And the truth comes about snopes.com just as I have stated earlier,(in the thread)that what snopes posts at face value. Also as stated snopes has a liberal agenda and would not think of saying or quoting anything conservative as that may make liberals look one sided, or left leaning
Comprehension is not one of your strong suits, is it?


We should all take everything we read or hear at face value and then attempt to get to the source to find the truth.
Site like Snopes, Factcheck and Politifact back up thier claims with sources.
They are good starting points, not the end all. But at least they give sources which many sites do not.

Oh yeah, and I have found plenty of articles on all 3 of those sites that do defend conservatives. It is about facts, not opinions.

But of course, any site that defends any liberal view of any kind must be bad. :confused:
 

· hoo dat. wat.
Joined
·
21,591 Posts
Comprehension is not one of your strong suits, is it?


We should all take everything we read or hear at face value and then attempt to get to the source to find the truth.
Site like Snopes, Factcheck and Politifact back up thier claims with sources.
They are good starting points, not the end all. But at least they give sources which many sites do not.

Oh yeah, and I have found plenty of articles on all 3 of those sites that do defend conservatives. It is about facts, not opinions.

But of course, any site that defends any liberal view of any kind must be bad. :confused:
I swear to a God I don't believe in Pete - you make Aber61 bring up wallbuilders.com, I'm going to pee on your favorite chair. :mad:
 

· Get Up and Go
Joined
·
2,575 Posts
I swear to a God I don't believe in Pete - you make Aber61 bring up wallbuilders.com, I'm going to pee on your favorite chair. :mad:

I believe in you ScOoTiE.

My favorite is leather and we Oxy stuff to clean up after the dogs.

Besides, Wallbuilders is the end all cure all. Haven't you heard?
 
1 - 20 of 25 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top