Go Back   Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > General 4x4 Stuff > Politics, Government, or Religion Chat
GL4x4 Live! GL4x4 Casino

Politics, Government, or Religion Chat Bring your flamesuit!







Search
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 14th, 2008, 06:45 PM   #1
MrBi11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: Holly
Posts: 452
iTrader: (1)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default What is the penalty for being in contempt of the SCOTUS?

http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/

Quote:
Originally Posted by the SCOTUS blog


D.C. plans new limit on handguns
Monday, July 14th, 2008 1:01 pm
Officials of the city government in Washington, D.C., on Monday proposed a new measure that would allow handguns to be in a ready-to-use condition only for prompt reactions to threats of “immediate harm” within the home. In a planned response to the http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/

From the SCOTUS blog... Confused? me too...

D.C. plans new limit on handguns
Monday, July 14th, 2008 1:01 pm
Officials of the city government in Washington, D.C., on Monday proposed a new measure that would allow handguns to be in a ready-to-use condition only for prompt reactions to threats of “immediate harm” within the home. In a planned response to the Supreme Court’s June 26 ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller (07-290), local officials released the text of a “Firearms Control Emergency Act of 2008.” The City Council plans to act on the bill during a legislative session Tuesday, on an emergency basis, officials said.

A news release describing the bill and a new set of police regulations on guns can be found here. At the bottom of the release are links to a new amnesty proposal, the text of the proposed new gun law, and the text of proposed new regulations to implement that law when it is enacted by the City Council.

In the Supreme Court’s Heller decision, the Justices declared a new constitutional right to have a gun for self-defense in the home, and struck down a 1976 law so far as it barred possession of handguns in the home for self-defense. The Court also nullified a separate requirement that any gun kept in the home be unloaded and disassembled or have a trigger lock on.

Under the proposed new law for the city, handguns would have to be registered by anyone entitled to have such a gun. If the owner expects to use the gun for self-defense within the owner’s home, the owner would not need a separate license-to-carry for that purpose.

However, any gun kept in the owner’s home would have to be kept unloaded and disassembled or else disabled by a trigger lock. The only time that requirement is not in force, under the proposal law, would be when the gun was “being used to protect against a reasonably perceived threat of immediate harm to a person” within that person’s home.

That provision, officials told reporters, was meant to allow a handgun owner to get the gun and load it — for example, if a burglar were at the door. It would not allow the gun to be loaded or assembled or unlocked at all times it remained in the home.

Officials said they expected that this provision might be challenged in court by gun rights groups or individuals, on the theory that it is too restrictive and would not allow practical access to a working gun in an emergency.

Under the proposal, a handgun could be registered but only if it was submitted to police for a ballistics test, to determine whether it had been stolen or used in a crime. Registration would be limited to one gun per individual during the first 90 days the law was in effect.

Outside the home, handguns would generally be banned, except that they could be used elsewhere “for lawful recreational purposes” or could be carried “for a lawful purpose” allowed by federal or District law.

Under District law, the emergency bill would go into effect immediately, and remain in effect for no more than 90 days. The City Council will take up proposals for permanent legislation in September, it is understood.

The amnesty and police gun regulations disclosed Monday are designed to implement the new approach to gun control. The amnesty provision, in effect for six months, would mean that a person entitled to register a handgun would not be prosecuted for previously having an unregistered pistol. There would be no amnesty for any crime committed using the gun.
June 26 ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller (07-290), local officials released the text of a “Firearms Control Emergency Act of 2008.” The City Council plans to act on the bill during a legislative session Tuesday, on an emergency basis, officials said.

A news release describing the bill and a new set of police regulations on guns can be found here. At the bottom of the release are links to a new amnesty proposal, the text of the proposed new gun law, and the text of proposed new regulations to implement that law when it is enacted by the City Council.

In the Supreme Court’s Heller decision, the Justices declared a new constitutional right to have a gun for self-defense in the home, and struck down a 1976 law so far as it barred possession of handguns in the home for self-defense. The Court also nullified a separate requirement that any gun kept in the home be unloaded and disassembled or have a trigger lock on.

Under the proposed new law for the city, handguns would have to be registered by anyone entitled to have such a gun. If the owner expects to use the gun for self-defense within the owner’s home, the owner would not need a separate license-to-carry for that purpose.

However, any gun kept in the owner’s home would have to be kept unloaded and disassembled or else disabled by a trigger lock. The only time that requirement is not in force, under the proposal law, would be when the gun was “being used to protect against a reasonably perceived threat of immediate harm to a person” within that person’s home.

That provision, officials told reporters, was meant to allow a handgun owner to get the gun and load it — for example, if a burglar were at the door. It would not allow the gun to be loaded or assembled or unlocked at all times it remained in the home.

Officials said they expected that this provision might be challenged in court by gun rights groups or individuals, on the theory that it is too restrictive and would not allow practical access to a working gun in an emergency.

Under the proposal, a handgun could be registered but only if it was submitted to police for a ballistics test, to determine whether it had been stolen or used in a crime. Registration would be limited to one gun per individual during the first 90 days the law was in effect.

Outside the home, handguns would generally be banned, except that they could be used elsewhere “for lawful recreational purposes” or could be carried “for a lawful purpose” allowed by federal or District law.

Under District law, the emergency bill would go into effect immediately, and remain in effect for no more than 90 days. The City Council will take up proposals for permanent legislation in September, it is understood.

The amnesty and police gun regulations disclosed Monday are designed to implement the new approach to gun control. The amnesty provision, in effect for six months, would mean that a person entitled to register a handgun would not be prosecuted for previously having an unregistered pistol. There would be no amnesty for any crime committed using the gun.


Didn't one of the Justices refer to this already during the hearing? Something like: "So, I have to wake up, put the light on, find my glasses, find the key to the padlock . . . . ." Didn't that carry through into the ruling?
MrBi11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 14th, 2008, 07:56 PM   #2
XXXJ
Desert Rat
 
XXXJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-09-07
Location: Memphis, Mi
Posts: 5,559
iTrader: (12)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Default

I was wondering the same thing.
D.C. is skirting the line, but on the wrong side. This is unprecedented.
It would be funny to see U.S. Marshals hook Fenty and Lanier for contempt!!
XXXJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 17th, 2008, 07:23 PM   #3
MrBi11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 01-05-06
Location: Holly
Posts: 452
iTrader: (1)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

DC turned down Heller's pistol registration today, I think there's gunna be a bit more going on...
MrBi11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > General 4x4 Stuff > Politics, Government, or Religion Chat
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Copyright ©2005 - 2012 Cracker Enterprises - Powered by Linux
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=
Page generated in 0.12675 seconds with 18 queries