Originally Posted by Dave Kerwin
This time, you have indeed, and I thank you for your thorough responce.
"While there is some truth to that statement, it is an illogical argument against something having been documented in history."
"Those qualifications mentioned are pretty reasonable, but I encourage you not to throw out the historicaly baby with its bathwater. There are plenty of non-biblical recordings of Jesus, saying that many followed him, that he was acclaimed to have done this and that, etc. The non-believing historians wrote down the fact that some major buzz was following this dude."
Okay, so link us to some real, nonbiblical, historical documentation written during that time. Show us some of that "buzz".