Upper Tellico Off-Highway Vehicle Area DECISION - Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest

Go Back   Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > 4x4 Land Use > Rules, Regulations, Trail, and ORV Park Chat
GL4x4 Live! GL4x4 Casino

greatlakes4x4.com is the premier Great Lakes 4x4 Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Search
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 18th, 2007, 07:50 PM   #1
Trail_Fanatic
Member since 1994
 
Trail_Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-25-06
Location: Muskegon and Oceana Counties
Posts: 3,174
iTrader: (0)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default Upper Tellico Off-Highway Vehicle Area DECISION

Copied from the United site:



DECISION MEMO

Forest Supervisor’s Orders for the
Upper Tellico Off-Highway Vehicle Area
USDA Forest Service Southern Region
Nantahala National Forest
Tusquitee Ranger District
Cherokee County, North Carolina


DECISION

I have decided to put into force two Forest Supervisor’s Orders for
the Upper Tellico Off-Highway (OHV) Area on the Tusquitee Ranger
District of the Nantahala National Forest. This decision is based on
information gathered during a recent condition survey of high risk
trail segments, and on public comments received during the scoping
period. The Orders implement the following management measures:

1. A one-year closure of Lower Trail 2 (from the intersection with
Road 420 west to Road 402), Trail 7, a portion of Trail 8 (from the
intersection with Trail 9 to the intersection with Trail 10A), and
Trail 9 in the Upper Tellico OHV area which prohibits operating motor
vehicles on these trails during the closure period and sets penalties
for violating the provisions of this Order.

2. A seasonal closure of the Upper Tellico OHV Area which prohibits
operating motor vehicles on trails within the Area during the period
between January 1 and March 31 each year and sets penalties for
violating the provisions of this Order.

The following persons are exempted from these orders:

• Persons with a permit from the Forest Service specifically
authorizing the otherwise prohibited act or omission.
• Any Federal, State, or local officer, or member of an organized
rescue or firefighting force in the performance of an official duty.
• Owners or lessees of land in the Closure Area are exempt from the
prohibitions listed above to the extent necessary to gain access to
their land.
• Residents in the Closure Area are exempt from the prohibitions to
the extent necessary to gain access to their residences.


PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE ACTION

Direction in the Land and Resource Management Plan for the Nantahala
National Forest (Amendment 5, 1994) identifies the lands within the
Upper Tellico OHV Area as existing in Management Areas 1B and 2C. The
description for these management areas state “These lands are managed
to provide opportunities for public enjoyment of the Forest through
motorized recreation – driving for pleasure in conventional and
four-wheel-drive vehicles as well as machines commonly classified as
ORV’s. While these uses will be encouraged on appropriate roads and
trails, use will not be allowed to damage the Forests’ environment.”
(MA 1B, p. III-57). Also, “Provide opportunities for vehicles commonly
classified as ORV’s on designated routes primarily within designated
ORV areas... if such use does not adversely affect other resources.”
(MA 2B, p. III-67). These actions are needed to correct ongoing
impacts to area waters and aquatic resources caused by sediment from
the Upper Tellico road and trail system.

In October and November of 2007, the Forest Service conducted an
initial condition survey of Upper Tellico roads and trails identified
as “high risk” for sedimentation due to steepness or close proximity
to water (about 16.5 miles of trail were evaluated). Drainage features
constructed to remove water from trails were assessed - 61 % of these
drainage features were properly functioning during the assessment. All
trail segments assessed were contributing sediment to nearby streams
to some degree. The Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) computer
model was used to compare trail management alternatives to the current
condition (http://topsoil.nserl.purdue.edu/nserlweb/weppmain/). The
sediment reductions projected to occur based on the closure of various
trail segments (and the seasonal closure) were evaluated. These
projections indicated that closing the proposed trail segments would
maximize sediment reduction while also maintaining a viable trail
system.

All trail bridges in the Upper Tellico system were also assessed for
safety. Three trail bridges on Trail 8 were determined to be unsafe
for OHV traffic and a portion of the trail was closed under an
emergency order. Since it will not be possible to complete repairs to
these bridges during the emergency closure period, this portion of
Trail 8 was added to the year-long temporary trail closure order.

Scientific studies addressing the impacts of a winter seasonal closure
were also reviewed. Multiple past studies have shown the degree of
soil compaction and rutting, and therefore erosion potential, on a
road surface is related to the number of freeze-thaw cycles, as well
as the amount and type of traffic present. In areas where soil
moisture is already high, there is increased potential for erosion
(Halvorsen et al. 2001). Frequent freeze-thaw cycles typically occur
during the winter months in the Southern Appalachian Mountains
(Williams 1964). Also, during winter months, soil structure and
function change (Sulkava and Huhta 2003) and most vegetation is
dormant, which reduces natural buffer ability to assimilated eroded
soil. And additionally, estimated increases in winter water yield
resulting from the loss of hemlock from the forest (due to the effects
of the hemlock wooly adelgid) approach 30% (Ford and Vose 2007). These
known and potential increases in sedimentation of local streams during
winter months affect aquatic habitat at a critical time for many
aquatic species, including native brook trout (Schmitt et al. 1993).

Proposed Action 1, closure on Lower Trail 2 (from the intersection
with Road 420 west to Road 402), Trail 7, a portion of Trail 8 (from
the intersection with Trail 9 to the intersection with Trail 10A),and
Trail 9, is needed to provide immediate resource protection measures.
These trails have been identified as contributing to sedimentation in
the Tellico River system. The closure will allow time for further
evaluation of the resource condition associated with these trails,
planning for long-term resource protection, and needed repairs to
correct impacts to the area waters and aquatic resource.

Proposed Action 2, seasonal closure of the OHV Area, is needed for the
purpose of preventing resource damage during a period when the area is
most vulnerable to resource damage, and to allow for intensive
maintenance of system trails. Seasonal closures have already been
implemented at other all other mountain OHV areas on the National
Forests in North Carolina.

The actions will be implemented pursuant to 36 CFR 261.50 (b) which
states, “The Chief, each Regional Forester, each Experiment Station
Director, the Administrator of the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit
and each Forest Supervisor may issue orders which close or restrict
the use of any National Forest System road or trail within the area
over which he has jurisdiction.”

REASONS FOR CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDING THE DECISION

These actions do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the quality of the human environment, and therefore, are
categorically excluded from documentation in an environmental impact
statement (EIS) or an environmental assessment (EA). The specific
category, identified in Forest Service Handbook 1909.15 “Environmental
Policy and Procedures” is Section 31.12 Category 1: Orders pursuant to
36 CFR Part 261 – Prohibitions to provide short-term resource
protection or to protect public health and safety.


FINDING OF NO EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES

No extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant further analysis and
documentation in an EA or EIS. The District interdisciplinary team
screened these actions for the presence of any one of the
extraordinary circumstances identified in Amendment No. 1909.15-2007-1
to Forest Service Handbook 1909.15. Section 30.3 paragraph 2 lists the
following resource conditions that were considered:

• Federally listed threatened or endangered species or designated
critical habitat, species proposed for Federal listing or proposed
critical habitat, or Forest Service sensitive species;
• Flood plains, wetlands, or municipal watersheds;
• Congressionally designated areas, such as wilderness, wilderness
study areas, or national recreation areas;
• Inventoried roadless areas;
• Research natural areas;
• American Indians and Alaska Native religious or cultural sites;
• Archaeological sites, or historic properties or areas.

SCOPING AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

more info on site..

MARISUE HILLIARD DATE
Forest Supervisor
National Forests in North Carolina
Trail_Fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old December 18th, 2007, 07:51 PM   #2
Trail_Fanatic
Member since 1994
 
Trail_Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-25-06
Location: Muskegon and Oceana Counties
Posts: 3,174
iTrader: (0)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default Also coppied from United:

Dave Logan Southern Four Wheel Drive Association
Delegate


Re: Upper Tellico Off-Highway Vehicle Area DECISION « Reply #1 on: Today at 07:46:38 PM »

Thanks for posting this, Robert. I sent it to Todd earlier. Carla also has a copy of it.

We are reviewing our options...
Trail_Fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18th, 2007, 07:58 PM   #3
Icemanii
GLFWDA Land Use Committee
 
Icemanii's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-07-05
Location: 48085
Posts: 5,233
iTrader: (16)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Read this on Pirate today as well. Looks like TU is one up on us here. They have some pretty deep pockets when it comes to $ for legal fees however.
Icemanii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18th, 2007, 08:09 PM   #4
Trail_Fanatic
Member since 1994
 
Trail_Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-25-06
Location: Muskegon and Oceana Counties
Posts: 3,174
iTrader: (0)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Yea.

Have to agree.

Their members don't ask "What's in it for me?"

They look at the big picture and write the check.
Trail_Fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18th, 2007, 08:10 PM   #5
brimy311
Smells like a Fork Liftis
 
brimy311's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: Kzoo, mi
Posts: 4,092
iTrader: (42)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to brimy311
Default

This sucks, Alot of the problems on Lower two are from ppl bypassing on quads. We are running there in april, hope it stays open for a few more years and this is just an errosion prevention for the winter months and not a perminant closure to come.
__________________
JcrOffroad.com
Like us on Faceook!
brimy311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18th, 2007, 08:53 PM   #6
Chiefwoohaw
Pokerob is my B*tch!
 
Chiefwoohaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-06-05
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,507
iTrader: (7)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brimy311 View Post
This sucks, Alot of the problems on Lower two are from ppl bypassing on quads. We are running there in april, hope it stays open for a few more years and this is just an errosion prevention for the winter months and not a perminant closure to come.
x2, hopefully with you and my club down here.

Sad, very sad

My club down here is a member of Southern Four Wheel Drive Association and that is were our money goes. Lets hope for the best!~!

Last edited by Chiefwoohaw; December 18th, 2007 at 09:20 PM.
Chiefwoohaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18th, 2007, 09:06 PM   #7
Icemanii
GLFWDA Land Use Committee
 
Icemanii's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-07-05
Location: 48085
Posts: 5,233
iTrader: (16)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trail_Fanatic View Post
Yea.

Have to agree.

Their members don't ask "What's in it for me?"

They look at the big picture and write the check.
exactly, just pay the money and feel good about helping the 'cause'. Bet a lot of them couldn't even find Tellico on a map. But it still works against us and that sucks. Need to keep the pressure up to make sure these stay as a temp closing only.
Icemanii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2007, 10:25 AM   #8
whiterhino
I'm not old, honest...
 
whiterhino's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-07-06
Location: Davisburg MI
Posts: 21,257
iTrader: (21)
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trail_Fanatic View Post
Yea.

Have to agree.

Their members don't ask "What's in it for me?"

They look at the big picture and write the check.
Wish we could get the same attitude for United and GLFWDA.
whiterhino is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > 4x4 Land Use > Rules, Regulations, Trail, and ORV Park Chat

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright 2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Page generated in 0.23286 seconds with 46 queries