GMO free seeds website GOOD to know if you care - Page 5 - Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest

Go Back   Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > General 4x4 Stuff > The Pub
GL4x4 Live! GL4x4 Casino

The Pub A friendly forum where everybody is nice, and will answer any questions you have about life.

greatlakes4x4.com is the premier Great Lakes 4x4 Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Search
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 9th, 2013, 10:19 AM   #81
SS
Blinded By The Light
 
SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-05
Location: Mogadishu, Somalia
Posts: 11,755
iTrader: (13)
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tgmaul View Post
clean and unclean is more seen at is it kosher. not sprayed with gmo or poo you dummy.
Its not about me its about you growing your own garden with healthy seeds. and All I was trying to do is provide a website with seed options. not a group discussion of this and that
You really should read the link in Schweeb's post.
__________________
-Jeremy

Watch yourself. I'll light you up.
SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old April 9th, 2013, 10:20 AM   #82
mschaffer66
Senior Member
 
mschaffer66's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Posts: 9,206
iTrader: (17)
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiveturkey3 View Post
No just irritated with false comments made about an industry that supports me. Much like a few weeks ago when mschaffer66 made the comment that chicken was pumped full of hormones. It interest me why people run their mouth with no education on the subject. His "clean unclean" website at a quick glance list Heniz products as clean. How ever I personally have been in fields where tomatoes grown for Heinz have been sprayed multiple times thought the growing season. So a website he links as "credible" contradicts his previous statements. Leads me to believe he educated himself on what he wants to believe and left many facts out.
You do realize that site he posted was about what is Kosher and what is not... It has nothing to do with what is chemically clean, or organic, or anything else.
mschaffer66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 10:20 AM   #83
tgmaul
Senior Member
 
tgmaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-05-12
Location: midland
Posts: 389
iTrader: (8)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SS View Post
You really should read the link in Schweeb's post.
not looking to get a computer virus
tgmaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 10:21 AM   #84
SS
Blinded By The Light
 
SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-05
Location: Mogadishu, Somalia
Posts: 11,755
iTrader: (13)
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tgmaul View Post
not looking to get a computer virus
Seriously?

Wow.
__________________
-Jeremy

Watch yourself. I'll light you up.
SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 10:23 AM   #85
SS
Blinded By The Light
 
SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-05
Location: Mogadishu, Somalia
Posts: 11,755
iTrader: (13)
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Default

Quote:

No GMO Labeling Laws in the USA!

It's a useless label. "WARNING: CONTAINS GMOs" is just as useless as "WARNING: TECHNOLOGICALLY-DEPRIVED FOOD (organic)", "WARNING: GROWN WITH RADIATION (grown with the sun)", "WARNING: CHOKING HAZARD (all food in existence)", "WARNING: GROWN WITH FECAL MATER (grown using manure)", "WARNING: CONTAINS DHMO, WHICH IS USED IN MANY TOXIC CHEMICALS (all foods containing water)", or "WARNING: POSSIBLE CANCER RISK (almost all foods in existence)".

Okay, maybe I went a little overboard with my comparisons, but my point still stands. Labeling GMOs makes no sense, will noticeable increase food prices (regulation isn't free, and at this large of a scale it will be absurdly expensive), and will scare farmers away from using GMOs solely because of ignorant consumers trying to avoid GMOs.

Want to avoid GMOs? Buy Organic. Asking for labeling on GMOs is as idiotic as asking for labeling on all foods not exclusively handled by virgins.

2: Monsanto's GMOs are UnHealthy

The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) urges doctors to prescribe non-GMO diets for all patients.

Funny, I can't find that on their site anywhere. They do seem to be pro-labeling, but I don't see this claim.

They cite animal studies showing organ damage, gastrointestinal and immune system disorders, accelerated aging, and infertility.

No linked studies? No linked statement? They're probably using Seralini's studies anyways.

Human studies show how genetically modified (GM) food can leave material behind inside us, possibly causing long-term problems. Genes inserted into GM soy, for example, can transfer into the DNA of bacteria living inside us

[citation needed]

Ah, wait a second, I have a [three] citation(s)! Too bad it's the opposite conclusion...

We conclude that, although fragments of DNA large enough to contain an antibiotic-resistance gene may survive in the environment, the barriers to transfer, incorporation, and transmission are so substantial that any contribution to antibiotic resistance made by GM plants must be overwhelmed by the contribution made by antibiotic prescription in clinical practice.

and

The Working Party finds that there are no objective scientific grounds to believe that bacterial AR genes will migrate from GM plants to bacteria to create new clinical problems. [...] Hence, use of these bacterial resistance genes in GM plant development cannot be seen as a serious or credible threat to human or animal health or to the environment.

and

The amount of transgene that survived passage through the small bowel varied among individuals, with a maximum of 3.7% recovered at the stoma of one individual. The transgene did not survive passage through the intact gastrointestinal tract of human subjects fed GM soya. Three of seven ileostomists showed evidence of low-frequency gene transfer from GM soya to the microflora of the small bowel before their involvement in these experiments. As this low level of epsps in the intestinal microflora did not increase after consumption of the meal containing GM soya, we conclude that gene transfer did not occur during the feeding experiment.

Hmm.. Moving on...

and that the toxic insecticide produced by GM corn was found in the blood of pregnant women and their unborn fetuses.

This one is actually true. However, all it did was demonstrate that low levels of Cry1Ab were found inside pregnant women and their fetuses. It did not have any proof whatsoever of any negative effect caused by the Cry1Ab's presence.

Numerous health problems increased after GMOs were introduced in 1996. The percentage of Americans with three or more chronic illnesses jumped from 7% to 13% in just 9 years; food allergies skyrocketed, and disorders such as autism, reproductive disorders, digestive problems, and others are on the rise. Although there is not sufficient research to confirm that GMOs are a contributing factor, doctors groups such as the AAEM tell us not to wait before we start protecting ourselves, and especially our children who are most at risk.

http://i.imgur.com/520m1dw.jpg

I love it when I get to use this image.

The American Public Health Association and American Nurses Association are among many medical groups that condemn the use of GM bovine growth hormone, because the milk from treated cows has more of the hormone IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factor 1)―which is linked to cancer.

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/...onth-quackery/

Lack of Adequate FDA / USDA Safety Testing

In May 1992, Vice President Dan Quayle announced the FDA's anti consumer right-to-know policy which stated that GMO foods need NOT be labeled nor safety-tested.

...yes, because there's no proven danger to them, and they are practically identical to non-GM crops in safety and nutrition.

Meanwhile, prominent scientists such as Arpad Pusztai

http://www.mindfully.org/GE/Arpad-Pusztai-Potato.htm

http://www.agbioworld.org/biotech-in...-potatoes.html

lol

and Gilles-Eric Seralini have publicized alarming research revealing severe damage to animals (monkeys, lab rats) fed GMO foods including: sterilization, miscarriages, cancer, NEW allergies, seizures, and DEATH!!!

http://i.imgur.com/viDMsN0.jpg

Seriously though, Seralini is a terrible scientist. He's even funded by anti-biotech companies and groups. His studies are a joke. Here's just a few links criticizing his latest study.

http://www.geneticliteracyproject.or...-of-criticism/

http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/121128.htm

http://www.forbes.com/sites/henrymil...neering-study/

http://ksj.mit.edu/tracker/2012/09/r...-about-science

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...78691512007880

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworst...ts-is-rubbish/

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...7869151200796X

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...78691512007843

3: Monsanto Puts Small Farmers out of Business

100s of American farmers have been sued.

[citation needed]

[proof that they didn't deserve the lawsuits also needed]

Century-old seed stocks were destroyed.

[citation needed]

100,000s of Indian farmers commit suicide by drinking monsanto's RoundUp herbicide after massive GMO crop failures bankrupted them.

Jf_Queeny covered this.

Monsanto uses the courts aggressively. It has sued hundreds of American farmers for patent infringement in connection with its GE seed.

[citation needed]

[proof that they weren't justified with whatever lawsuits actually happened needed]

[[splitting comment into two parts]]

permalink

[–]firemylasers 26 points 10 hours ago

In a high profile case in Canada, which Monsanto won at the Supreme Court level,

Monsanto sued an independent farmer, Percy Schmeiser, for patent infringement for growing GMO genetically modified Roundup resistant canola in 1998. Percy Schmeiser is a Canadian farmer whose canola fields were contaminated with Monsanto's Round-Up Ready Canola by pollen from a nearby GMO farm. Monsanto successfully argued in a lawsuit that Schmeiser violated their patent rights, and forced Schmeiser to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages.

Mr. Schmeiser maintained that this was accidental. He testified that in the previous year, 1997, he had suspected contamination by genetically modified Roundup resistant canola along the roadside in one of his fields and hence had sprayed along the field edge with Roundup, whereupon he found that about 60% of the canola survived. The farm hand performing the harvest saved only seed from this contaminated roadside swathe for replanting in the next year, 1998, and presumably this seed was genetically modified Roundup resistant seed.

The court found that Mr. Schmeiser and his farming company (damages were assessed only against the company as Mr. Schmeiser was found to be acting in his capacity as director), "knew or ought to have known" the nature of the seed which was planted in 1998, and that by planting, growing and harvesting it, there was infringement of Monsanto's patent on canola cells genetically modified for Roundup resistance. This finding was upheld at the appellate court level.

Pure fucking lies.

Hey Schmeiser, how on earth did cross-pollination produce "a crop of 95–98% pure Roundup Ready plants"?

Schmeiser is a lying scumbag. His own field hand testified against him in court. He intentionally isolated and replanted RR plants by killing off his own crops. 60%? Accidental? Yeah right.

Monsanto Lawsuits Against Farmers In the United States

This type of biotech bullying is happening all over North America. The non-profit Center for Food Safety listed 112 lawsuits by Monsanto against farmers for claims of seed patent violations. The Center for Food Safety's analyst stated that many innocent farmers settle with Monsanto because they cannot afford a time consuming lawsuit. Monsanto is frequently described by farmers as "Gestapo" and "Mafia" both because of these lawsuits and because of the questionable means they use to collect evidence of patent infringement.

[citation needed]

[proof of farmers being innocent needed]

Indian Farmer Suicides After GMO BT Cotton Crop Failures

Jf_Queeny already covered this.

4: Monsanto Products Pollute the Developing World

Some truth, but mostly bullshit. Yes, they are guilty of contamination (to a certain point).

GMO crops and their associated herbicides can harm birds, insects, amphibians, marine ecosystems, and soil organisms.

Not really... The only harm I've ever seen proven was to a few non-target field insects, and that was only from certain types of Bt crops.

They reduce bio-diversity,

They technically increase it. Monoculture is the bogeyman you're looking for here.

pollute water resources,

If you want to argue the point, yes, they technically pollute water. As does a million other things. What the author here failed to note was that they have not been proven to actually have a harmful impact at the concentrations they are usually detected at, and they tend to break down fairly quickly anyways once in water.

and are unsustainable.

Lolwut. Reduced herbicide use, typically less toxic herbicides, increased yield (since less crop is lost, not as a direct effect of genetic modification (yet)), better for the environment.. What's not to like?

For example, GMO crops are eliminating habitat for monarch butterflies, whose populations are down 50% in the US.

Habitat, sure, but the same can be said of any crop... Derp.

Roundup herbicide has been shown to cause birth defects in amphibians, embryonic deaths and endocrine disruptions, and organ damage in animals even at very low doses.

[Citation needed]

[Seralini studies are no longer accepted as proof of anything]

GMO canola has been found growing wild in North Dakota and California, threatening to pass on its herbicide tolerant genes on to weeds.

And what the author fails to mention is that the plants found "growing wild"? They were three feet away from fields. Big fucking surprise, plants are capable of growing three feet away from the fields they were planted in. I even have photographic proof of this somewhere, assuming this guy is talking about the same study I read about.

there are 500,000 Agent Orange Babies... One Half Million! NOT Including Veterans!

Seven different chemical companies manufactured Agent Orange, all under contract from the US government. Why exactly is it all Monsanto's fault? They aren't the ones who loaded it onto planes and sprayed it over Vietnam.

Public Officials Formerly EMPLOYED by Monsanto

Only three out of those five were actually involved with Monsanto beyond consulting work.

7: Consumers Reject Bovine Growth Hormone rBGH in Milk

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RBGH

The Food and Drug Administration, World Health Organization, American Medical Association, American Dietetic Association, and National Institute of Health have independently stated that dairy products and meat from BST-treated cows are safe for human consumption.[1]

The FDA stated that food products made from rBST treated cows are safe for human consumption, and no statistically significant difference exists between milk derived from rBST-treated and non-rBST-treated cows.[49] The FDA found BGH to be biologically inactive when consumed by humans and found no biological distinction between rBST and BST.[49] In 1990, an independent panel convened by the National Institute of Health supported the FDA opinion that milk and meat from cows supplemented with rBST is safe for human consumption.[50]
8: GMO Crops Do Not Increase Yields

http://www.pgeconomics.co.uk/pdf/foc...ffects2009.pdf

http://www.salmone.org/wp-content/up...aim-cotton.pdf

http://www.ask-force.org/web/Benefit...efits-2002.pdf

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/1...20380600682215

10: Monsanto's GMO Foods Cause NEW Food Allergies

Err no..

http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/386/1317.full

Allergenic reactions to proteins expressed in GM crops has been one of the prominent concerns among biotechnology critics and a concern of regulatory agencies. Soybeans like many plants have intrinsic allergens that present problems for sensitive people. Current GM crops, including soybean, have not been shown to add any additional allergenic risk beyond the intrinsic risks already present. Biotechnology can be used to characterize and eliminate allergens naturally present in crops. Biotechnology has been used to remove a major allergen in soybean demonstrating that genetic modification can be used to reduce allergenicity of food and feed. This provides a model for further use of GM approaches to eliminate allergens.

I won't even bother commenting in depth on the other glaring problems with this page. Like their complete lack of citations/sources/studies/proof, their usage of images from the notorious conspiracy theorist artist Dee, and their rather idiotic choices for "further reading" at the bottom of the page.

I hope this helps you OP.

permalink
parent

[–]Scuderia 9 points 10 hours ago

As much as I enjoy reading your responses to these asinine post, I do feel it is unfortunately falling on deaf ears.

permalink
parent

[–]firemylasers 11 points 10 hours ago

Eh. It was fun to write up. And OP asked for criticism of the article.

permalink
parent

[–]NightHawk521 2 points 36 minutes ago

Ya I tried this before in a different thread that was actual mentioning the who India BT thing, mind you I didn't write it nearly as thoroughly or well thought out as you. Hopefully at least some people read this and educate themselves a little. Well done :)

permalink
parent

[–]JF_Queeny 5 points 3 hours ago

I've seen the Roundup embryo study. They injected something like 2 ml of glyphosate into chickens.

They also did it to tissue cultures and marveled at the changes. The awesome thing is with all of these, if you swapped out orange juice, the results would be far, far worse.

It was beyond bad.

permalink
parent

[–]m_Pony 7 points 2 hours ago

Buddy, your dedication is impressive. I'm no fan of some of Monsanto's practices, but I do believe that baseless attacks against them (or anybody) are fruitless endeavours. If people want to attack Monsanto for doing something bad, they should find the things that are actually provably bad.

permalink
parent

[–]Priest_Fingers 2 points 1 hour ago

Hell yes dude. I currently work for the environmental agency for a major agricultural state, and I can't thank you enough for having a clear view into the value of GM foods. Alarmism and the ignorance being spread by these people is a disservice to humanity and those who are starving around the world.

permalink
parent

[–]oconnellc 1 point 21 minutes ago

I've recently read that the US cultivates something like 70 percent of the 'harvestable' farmland... is the presence of starving people on the planet something of an artificial construct?

permalink
parent

[–]MindStalker 2 points 1 hour ago

I wish there were more like you around Reddit. The amount of FUD on reddit has grown to uncontrollable proportions lately. I've come to the stark conclusion that any story you see reported more than 3 or 4 times is probably mostly false.

permalink
parent

[–]oconnellc 1 point 26 minutes ago

This was an impressive amount of work. One question I have is that you frequently remark that a gmo hasn't been found to have negative effects. I'm comparing this to the effort that pharma companies have to put into research proving that a drug has no negative effects. The statement that no negative effects are known doesn't really ease my concerns. Are there similar efforts by the manufacturers of the gmo's to prove that there are no negative effects? And if so, why don't you use language that indicates this. Thanks in advance for your reply.

permalink
parent

[–]firemylasers 1 point 9 minutes ago

There are three major groups who study biotech (and, by extension, biotech safety). There's the companies (Monsanto, Dow, etc), the governments, and the independent studies.

So far, all three groups have published studies concluding there is no safety concerns with GM food.

There ARE scientists who have published studies that claim to prove GM food is harmful, but they are all (so far) flawed and many of them have seen extremely heavy criticism from scientists. In addition, a very large portion of these poorly-done studies are directly funded by groups with a very obvious interest in seeing the results they did (Greenpeace, Organic food companies, and anti-GMO advocacy groups are the three worst offenders).

While simple industry affiliation alone (no matter which industry it is) doesn't make a study bad, industry affiliation coupled with a consistent record of poorly-done studies is a solid reason to be wary of new anti-GMO studies. Biotech-funded studies should also be reviewed with caution, but it's the anti-biotech groups that have the record of bad studies.

Anyways, if you want a list of reputable studies done on GMOs, here's one: http://www.biofortified.org/genera/studies-for-genera/ (600)

Or the completely independent ones from that list: http://www.biofortified.org/genera/s...ndent-funding/ (~120)

permalink
parent

[–]TreephantBOA -1 points 29 minutes ago

Anything that is altered genetically should be labeled regardless if your information. People should know what's happening with their food as much as possible. This, of course, isn't the sole responsibility of the producer of the food. The govt should be involved in educating people on par with the information that you've given us and explain it in terms so they understand this information. An informed decision is important. But no opportunity to even have a choice on the matter is abhorrent. Label it. It's not much of a cost to add "GM product". if they can't label it people should believe there is something to hide. I'm sure the list of ingredients on a can of chili costs a little too. But i like that list of ingredients. I want to know what's in my food. It's that simple.

permalink
parent

[–]firemylasers 2 points 23 minutes ago

Anything that is altered genetically should be labeled regardless if your information.

"Anything not handled by virgins should be labeled regardless if your information"

People should know what's happening with their food as much as possible.

"People should know who's handling their food as much as possible"

Label it. It's not much of a cost to add "GM product"

Okay, serious response this time. Have you ever considered how complex the US food system is? You'd need to test and track every single crop grown to certify it as GMO or non GMO. The cost would be absurd. Making the taxpayers pay for it is even more absurd.

if they can't label it people should believe there is something to hide.

Oh, so if my food isn't labeled as non-exclusively handled by virgins, the food company has something to hide?

I'm sure the list of ingredients on a can of chili costs a little too. But i like that list of ingredients. I want to know what's in my food. It's that simple.

That one has an actual use, and doesn't require genetic testing of every single piece of food grown.

permalink
parent

[–]TreephantBOA 0 points 18 minutes ago

If you're into being dismissive by using "virgins" as a model you really aren't going to get far with me. i want my food to be labeled with altercations of the original just as I want food to have a list of ingredients. I am well aware of how complex it is to have things labeled. There's a damn good reason for that. And testing should be required just as it proved that people were eating horsemeat. The testing is already being done. The only thing that really comes up here is that the company fears the stigma of being labeled a GM food product. That's all it is.

permalink
parent

[–]JF_Queeny 3 points 7 minutes ago

Perhaps you should ask the companies directly to label it instead of petitioning the government. You know, like Kosher.

permalink
parent

[–]firemylasers 1 point 7 minutes ago

I used virgins as the example to illustrate the absurdity of your request. Did you not read the first section of my first comment in this thread? I think it shows quite clearly why GMO labeling is unneeded.

permalink
parent

[–]LarrySDonald 2 points 10 minutes ago

There's a bit of a fine line here. I do think it's good to know what you're buying, but there are generally limits on how much anyone knows. In an ideal world, yeah, perhaps it's be feasible to insist you can have a full copy of the genome. But usually, it's simplified somewhat. I don't know which exact sub-variant of tomato I'm buying. I do get to know that it's a tomato (not and apple or rutabaga), where it grew, who was the final handler before selling it and that it followed (at least ostensibly) the current regulations for "Shit One Must Do If Selling Tomatoes". But I don't get the exact everything. I don't know which strain, what fertilizers, what ground composition, the exact specs on nutrient content, etc. And I also don't know if this particular breed was generated by long-term selective breeding or by creatively editing the DNA directly.

It might be nice to know, but it's probably one of the less important factors in what they are actually calling "a tomato". It'd be nice to have more depth (at some point) but this isn't the first order of business if you really want to know more about the food itself.

permalink
parent

[–]TreephantBOA 1 point 24 seconds ago

I agree with most of what you just wrote. I think that's why a writer like Michael Pollen is so relevant now. People SHOULD ask more about their food and be more in touch with it. This may come off as common sense to many but if you take a long hard look at this country we are raising consumers, not people. I have three kids and they live with their Mom. I know that they usually take their lunch but occasionally eat food at school. I don't know what's in that food. They should. An informed decision is critical to change unhealthy eating habits. If it means labeling food in more detail I very much support it. But at the same time i would get rid of our old model of a cafeteria altogether and make "lunch" a course. A required course for every school year. Food is a major player in our life. As far as an 'ideal" world. Well, that's something we all disagree with on some levels and it certainly should be aspired to and not dismissed as an impossibility.
There. No virus threat.
__________________
-Jeremy

Watch yourself. I'll light you up.
SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 10:24 AM   #86
trogdor the burninator
Insert Comment Here.
 
trogdor the burninator's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-06
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 6,264
iTrader: (21)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to trogdor the burninator Send a message via MSN to trogdor the burninator
Default

this should be moved to the gardening/organic farming section.




__________________


Just another disgruntled OIF vet.
trogdor the burninator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 10:24 AM   #87
Jiveturkey3
Senior Member
 
Jiveturkey3's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-22-12
Location: Hillsdale MI
Posts: 3,417
iTrader: (1)
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tgmaul View Post
clean and unclean is more seen at is it kosher. not sprayed with gmo or poo you dummy.
Its not about me its about you growing your own garden with healthy seeds. and All I was trying to do is provide a website with seed options. not a group discussion of this and that
Oh I got ya. I guess I missed your point. You just want to make sure people aren't buying round up ready squash seed to plant in their garden? My mistake. I have notice all the local retailers selling all that GMO garden seed.
Jiveturkey3 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 10:28 AM   #88
tgmaul
Senior Member
 
tgmaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-05-12
Location: midland
Posts: 389
iTrader: (8)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

to each there own
tgmaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 10:28 AM   #89
Jiveturkey3
Senior Member
 
Jiveturkey3's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-22-12
Location: Hillsdale MI
Posts: 3,417
iTrader: (1)
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mschaffer66 View Post
You do realize that site he posted was about what is Kosher and what is not... It has nothing to do with what is chemically clean, or organic, or anything else.
That is my mistake. Sorry. I do understand Kosher food well my gf works at a Kosher facility.

Last edited by Jiveturkey3; April 9th, 2013 at 10:35 AM.
Jiveturkey3 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 10:35 AM   #90
Jiveturkey3
Senior Member
 
Jiveturkey3's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-22-12
Location: Hillsdale MI
Posts: 3,417
iTrader: (1)
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tgmaul View Post
to each there own
Trust me I have no problem with you choosing whatever type of food or seed to use. I will go so far as to say that SOME food grown under certain organizations rules to be considered organic are better tasting. I don't think they are better for you from a chemical free environment. However, I don't know how they stack up in nutritional value.

I don't like when someone says how bad the other option is without facts. I also don't like the generic term "organic" because much like "certified angus" it's a smoke and mirrors game.
Jiveturkey3 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 11:28 AM   #91
smasheromalley
Senior Member
 
smasheromalley's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-06-05
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,038
iTrader: (15)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

I feed my garden on dihydrogen monoxide. Its what plants crave
smasheromalley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 11:34 AM   #92
BlooMule
pew pew
 
BlooMule's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-08-05
Location: a mile from the shithole
Posts: 24,732
iTrader: (12)
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tgmaul View Post
well here it is the article you need to read about PROOF

http://www.infowars.com/new-gmo-stud...les-die-early/
First, I tend to take anything from info wars with a large grain of salt.
Second, where are the results on rats that were fed only GMO or only had a trace of Roundup added to a normal diet?

Also, I have had pet rats. After 4 or 5 years they would develop large tumors and die on a diet of pet store rat food.
__________________
-rw-rw-rw
BlooMule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 11:58 AM   #93
Mr.Green
I can levitate!
 
Mr.Green's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-29-05
Location: Nort Keralina
Posts: 8,088
iTrader: (6)
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whiterhino View Post
Disclaimer; I agree with eating healthy and reducing chemicals.

With that said, all this talk about dieing younger, isn't our average life expectancy in the USA the highest it's ever been? And more cancer, or just more aware of cancer? Years ago alot of people died of consumption which was basically a no answer on what was really wrong.
My kids generation will be the first generation in history to have a shorter life expentancy than their parents. Fawking sad.
Mr.Green is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 02:58 PM   #94
Mr.Green
I can levitate!
 
Mr.Green's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-29-05
Location: Nort Keralina
Posts: 8,088
iTrader: (6)
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Default

I am actually building an aquaponics system in my garage. Not joking.
Mr.Green is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 08:44 PM   #95
kerryann
German cars are hot
 
kerryann's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: West Bloomfield
Posts: 11,431
iTrader: (3)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Green again View Post
I have to agree with tgmaul on most of this. Our nations food supply is incredible meesed up. It just starts with the seeds, then it is the bug control, then the animals they feed it to, then how they medically treat the animals, then how it is processed, packaged and delivered to your store. I am sure it has nothing to do with everyone getting cancer, obesity and starting to die at younger and younger ages.
And food allergies.
I don't judge people by what they eat but myself and even my animals won't be eating GMOs. By the way I stopped eating GMOs January 5th and cut my calories some which I had tried many times before without much luck. I am down another 35lbs since then. If you don't believe GMOs contribute to obesity then that is your choice but I know based on my own body's reaction that it did for me.
kerryann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 08:50 PM   #96
kerryann
German cars are hot
 
kerryann's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: West Bloomfield
Posts: 11,431
iTrader: (3)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tgmaul View Post
a lot of the animals eating this gmo food is being fed to ........ us. and used for suger and on and on
Pretty much most of the sweetner in food is high fructose corn syrup and even the citric acid in everything comes from the gmo corn. Whether you are eating gmo corn kernels you are getting gmo corn and gmo soy in all of your packaged and processed food. I am not havng allergic reactions to non gmo regular corn because I am allergic to citric acid which in my old way of eating came from corn.. how effed up is that? Even my body says no thanks to gmo corn directly with hives.
kerryann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 08:51 PM   #97
kerryann
German cars are hot
 
kerryann's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: West Bloomfield
Posts: 11,431
iTrader: (3)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trogdor the burninator View Post
on one of the most right wing gun toting "insert racial slur here" hating websites around.
I love my guns and I hate GMOs.. how are the two related?

Sorry... i have been working for the last two days and am catching up
kerryann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 08:51 PM   #98
BlooMule
pew pew
 
BlooMule's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-08-05
Location: a mile from the shithole
Posts: 24,732
iTrader: (12)
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kerryann View Post
And food allergies.
I don't judge people by what they eat but myself and even my animals won't be eating GMOs. By the way I stopped eating GMOs January 5th and cut my calories some which I had tried many times before without much luck. I am down another 35lbs since then. If you don't believe GMOs contribute to obesity then that is your choice but I know based on my own body's reaction that it did for me.
Sitting on my ass most of the time driving a van all over the country contributed to my weight problem. I've gained 50lbs since I took this job and it's all I can do to keep from packing on any more. When I get to stay home for a week, I drop 10 lbs easy.
__________________
-rw-rw-rw
BlooMule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 08:56 PM   #99
kerryann
German cars are hot
 
kerryann's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: West Bloomfield
Posts: 11,431
iTrader: (3)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schweeb View Post
Some info and useful links to studies that support those skeptical that GMO causes issues:

http://www.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comm...ouldnt/c9bezf0
This doesn't say GMOs are good it just says some of the things said about them are wrong???

Also somewhere in this thread someone said something about 50% of the world starving being saved by GMOs. There is still a good portion of the world starving. They don't put it on our tvs often, probably as often as they should, but a good portion of the 3rd world starves or is not getting adequate food.
kerryann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2013, 08:57 PM   #100
kerryann
German cars are hot
 
kerryann's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: West Bloomfield
Posts: 11,431
iTrader: (3)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deerebowtie View Post
so you and ms. chaffer are gardening with open polinated species, and not using any fertilizers or insecticides/herbicides? I'd like to purchase some of your broccoli and coli-flower seed....
I actually have my organic garden as seedlings right now but I am not a farmer so I am not sharing.
kerryann is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > General 4x4 Stuff > The Pub

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright 2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Page generated in 0.64692 seconds with 80 queries