Americans are about to give Obama a bloody nose - Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest

Go Back   Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > General 4x4 Stuff > Politics, Government, or Religion Chat
GL4x4 Live! GL4x4 Casino

Politics, Government, or Religion Chat Bring your flamesuit!

greatlakes4x4.com is the premier Great Lakes 4x4 Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Search
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 2nd, 2010, 09:05 AM   #1
greygoose
I'm the dude
 
greygoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-08
Location: New Baltimore / Presque Isle
Posts: 6,081
iTrader: (1)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default Americans are about to give Obama a bloody nose

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...=feeds-newsxml
greygoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old November 2nd, 2010, 09:09 AM   #2
GreaseMonkey
Senior Member
 
GreaseMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-04-05
Location: Madison Heights, MI
Posts: 18,003
iTrader: (22)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Default

I'd like to give him more than that.
GreaseMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2010, 09:23 AM   #3
greygoose
I'm the dude
 
greygoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-08
Location: New Baltimore / Presque Isle
Posts: 6,081
iTrader: (1)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreaseMonkey View Post
I'd like to give him more than that.
greygoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2010, 10:04 AM   #4
Nuggets
I fix stuff!
 
Nuggets's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 13,440
iTrader: (13)
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Default

The artical praises Obama but it ignores the massive debt he has plunged this country into. The author also makes out those who dislike Obama as inbred fucktards.

I think Obama's (and the Democrats in general), problem is that he is not following the will of the people; example: heathcare. That and he's a raging douchbag that used the "have-nots" as a stepping stone to power.
Nuggets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2010, 11:12 AM   #5
Detroit_Doc
Member
 
Join Date: 10-15-06
Location: Waterford, mi
Posts: 41
iTrader: (1)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuggets View Post
The artical praises Obama but it ignores the massive debt he has plunged this country into. The author also makes out those who dislike Obama as inbred fucktards.

I think Obama's (and the Democrats in general), problem is that he is not following the will of the people; example: heathcare. That and he's a raging douchbag that used the "have-nots" as a stepping stone to power.

You have no clue what you're talking about. Lay off Obama! It's not his fault...












He just does what the teleprompter tells him to do.
Detroit_Doc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2010, 11:35 AM   #6
Ironman Offroad
Cool parts peddler
 
Ironman Offroad's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-29-10
Location: Saginaw, Michigan
Posts: 1,546
iTrader: (12)
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Detroit_Doc View Post
You have no clue what you're talking about. Lay off Obama! It's not his fault...












He just does what the teleprompter tells him to do.
That's funny but true.
The article talked about the "entitlists he has surrounded himself with".
Ironman Offroad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2010, 11:39 AM   #7
Mulely
Senior Member
 
Mulely's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-04-06
Location: St Joseph, MI
Posts: 1,183
iTrader: (13)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to Mulely
Default

Oh, and I love the part about "The zealots and bigots of the Right-wing Tea Party hate him as no President has been hated by the Right since Franklin Roosevelt. Even many Democrats avow disappointment"

Does that make us all bigots now?
Mulely is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2010, 11:52 AM   #8
ovrlnd
HURL SCOUTS
 
ovrlnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-23-07
Location: Westland, Michigan
Posts: 10,003
iTrader: (14)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to ovrlnd
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulely View Post
Oh, and I love the part about "The zealots and bigots of the Right-wing Tea Party hate him as no President has been hated by the Right since Franklin Roosevelt. Even many Democrats avow disappointment"

Does that make us all bigots now?
yes, because you should know by now you have to be a pussy to be an american nowadays.
ovrlnd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2010, 12:50 PM   #9
Yetti
Buy a Fiat! Save the UAW!
 
Yetti's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: 20 minutes south of Hell...
Posts: 14,385
iTrader: (10)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Default

The US mid-term elections on Tuesday are shaping up to be a referendum on President Barack Obama's administration. SPIEGEL ONLINE spoke with former US Labor Secretary Robert Reich about demagoguery in US politics, economic inequality and the parallels between 2010 and 1929.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: The US goes to the polls on Tuesday for critical mid-term elections. It is a difficult time for the country -- you have said it is facing a "perfect storm." What do you mean by that?


Reich: First, we have got an unprecedented degree of concentrated income and wealth at the very top of our society. The top one-tenth of one percent of Americans now makes more than the bottom 120 million. Secondly, courtesy of a grotesque opinion by the Supreme Court of the United States, we now have virtually unlimited money flowing from the rich and from corporations through secret devices that make it impossible to know who is contributing what to various campaigns and to advertising for and against various candidates. Such anonymous groups have spent more than $400 million on the latest election, according to estimates. And finally, we have a broad electorate still unemployed or in danger of being unemployed, still in danger of losing their homes or already having lost their homes, still experiencing a major drop in their savings or their net worth. This frustrated and anxious population is easy prey to demagogues who will blame others for their problems rather than explain what needs to be done.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: In other words, it is no surprise that candidates opposing government spending appear likely to win many of the open Congressional seats.

Reich: This is one of the areas that are very easy to demagogue. By accusing government of being the enemy and promising people that if we simply shrink government they will be better, some politicians and ideologues are attempting to improve their own positions of power. They are misleading the voters. We know that when the private sector is unwilling or unable to spend and when consumers are under a huge debt load, government is the last remaining spender, at least in the short term. Long term deficits do have to be reduced, but unless we get the economy growing in the short term through government spending, we're all going to be experiencing a much longer and more painful so called recovery. We need a bigger stimulus now.


SPIEGEL ONLINE: Why then is President Barack Obama's Democratic Party so wary of considering an increase in government spending?
Reich: It started with the bailout of Wall Street. The socalled Tea Party movement that's gradually taking over the Republican Party began when President George W. Bush and, after him, President Obama provided Wall Street with $700 billion. It looked and felt like an insider job, a rigged deal to many Americans. In the US, when there is a sense that government and business are in cahoots, the tendency is to blame government rather than business. Had Obama put very strict conditions on that bailout, requiring for example, that Wall Street firms lend to small businesses, that homeowners be allowed to reorganize their mortgage debts under personal bankruptcy, that they limited their own pay, I don't think we would have had the kind of reaction we did. Obama also failed to connect the dots, showing America that the financial reform bill, the health care bill, and the jobs bill, the stimulus package, were all part of a broader effort to restore the middle class and fairness in the American economy.


SPIEGEL ONLINE: It is easy to blame the politicians. But what about the American consumers? They went on a spending spree -- and should have known better.
Reich: The American economy has grown tically over the last three decades, but median wages have barely grown at all. Median family incomes have grown slightly but only because women have gone into the paid workforce in great numbers, because everyone was working longer and because people had more disposable income to the extent that they could borrow. Now we're in trouble because all of those coping mechanisms, as I call them, are exhausted. When so much income goes to the top, the vast middle class and working class simply don't have enough money to buy all the things the economy is capable of producing without going deep into debt, and that debt bubble cannot be sustained. To suggest that the problem is that American consumers spent beyond their means begs a far more fundamental question: Why didn't their means increase as the economy increased in size tically. We have not seen such a large gap between the top and the bottom since 1929 and you know what happened then.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: In addition to the Great Depression, there was also a sharp increase in the amount of national rage, both with politicians and within the political debate. Could that happen again?
Reich: I think what we're seeing now in America is an outbreak of isolationism, nativism, and xenophobia. The Tea Party is against foreign trade. We are also seeing an outbreak of anti immigrant sentiment across the country. The anger directed at China now is out of proportion to China's real effect on the American economy. China is not to blame for 15 million jobs being lost over the last two and a half years. My point is that we are already seeing the hallmarks of the politics of anger and resentment, which led in the 1930s to isolationism. That's very much what worries me.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: On the other hand, the angry debates back then ushered in significant reforms. Can that happen again?
Reich:
That is the big question whether we will adopt reforms of a similar nature to the reforms we adopted in the 1930s, '40s, '50s and '60s -- reforms that tically expanded opportunity and also public investments in education and infrastructure. We then had 30 percent of our population in trade unions. Now it's fewer than 8 percent. Then we had a marginal income tax on the highest earners of 91 percent, now the marginal income tax on highest earners is 36 percent, but the super rich have managed to exploit a loophole in which much of their income is treated as capital gains and, therefore, subject to only a 15 percent tax.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: When you served in the White House, President Bill Clinton began on the left but drifted to the middle after the Democrats lost significant ground in the mid-term elections. Do you see that happening again?

Reich: I was there with Bill Clinton when he tried to so called "triangulate" and please the voters in the middle. But the middle is a fiction. The middle is simply where most voters who respond to surveys say they are. What Clinton did and what Obama may be forced to do is to give up leadership; that is, to simply respond to polls. I think it would be a shame if Obama moved from leadership to opinion polls, but his advisers may feel that that's the only way to guarantee him a re-election.


http://www.spiegel.de/international/...726575,00.html
__________________
Yetti

Last edited by Yetti; November 2nd, 2010 at 12:53 PM.
Yetti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2010, 02:11 PM   #10
TJJEEP
Senior Member
 
TJJEEP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-08-05
Location: Orchard Lake
Posts: 2,928
iTrader: (2)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to TJJEEP Send a message via MSN to TJJEEP
Default

The author can go fukc himself.
__________________
If you're like me you like to talk to things. I'm Gary Busey!!
TJJEEP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2010, 02:29 PM   #11
Nuggets
I fix stuff!
 
Nuggets's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 13,440
iTrader: (13)
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TJJEEP View Post
The author can go fukc himself.
with a crooked stick!
Nuggets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2010, 02:36 PM   #12
TJJEEP
Senior Member
 
TJJEEP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-08-05
Location: Orchard Lake
Posts: 2,928
iTrader: (2)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to TJJEEP Send a message via MSN to TJJEEP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuggets View Post
with a crooked stick!
While America is fighting to give him a bloody nose, the author is trying to squeeze his way in to give him a BJ.
__________________
If you're like me you like to talk to things. I'm Gary Busey!!
TJJEEP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2010, 03:11 PM   #13
pizzaman
Senior Member
 
pizzaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: Independence Twsp, North Oakland County
Posts: 938
iTrader: (3)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yetti View Post
The US mid-term elections on Tuesday are shaping up to be a referendum on President Barack Obama's administration. SPIEGEL ONLINE spoke with former US Labor Secretary Robert Reich about demagoguery in US politics, economic inequality and the parallels between 2010 and 1929.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: The US goes to the polls on Tuesday for critical mid-term elections. It is a difficult time for the country -- you have said it is facing a "perfect storm." What do you mean by that?


Reich: First, we have got an unprecedented degree of concentrated income and wealth at the very top of our society. The top one-tenth of one percent of Americans now makes more than the bottom 120 million. Secondly, courtesy of a grotesque opinion by the Supreme Court of the United States, we now have virtually unlimited money flowing from the rich and from corporations through secret devices that make it impossible to know who is contributing what to various campaigns and to advertising for and against various candidates. Such anonymous groups have spent more than $400 million on the latest election, according to estimates. And finally, we have a broad electorate still unemployed or in danger of being unemployed, still in danger of losing their homes or already having lost their homes, still experiencing a major drop in their savings or their net worth. This frustrated and anxious population is easy prey to demagogues who will blame others for their problems rather than explain what needs to be done.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: In other words, it is no surprise that candidates opposing government spending appear likely to win many of the open Congressional seats.

Reich: This is one of the areas that are very easy to demagogue. By accusing government of being the enemy and promising people that if we simply shrink government they will be better, some politicians and ideologues are attempting to improve their own positions of power. They are misleading the voters. We know that when the private sector is unwilling or unable to spend and when consumers are under a huge debt load, government is the last remaining spender, at least in the short term. Long term deficits do have to be reduced, but unless we get the economy growing in the short term through government spending, we're all going to be experiencing a much longer and more painful so called recovery. We need a bigger stimulus now.


SPIEGEL ONLINE: Why then is President Barack Obama's Democratic Party so wary of considering an increase in government spending?
Reich: It started with the bailout of Wall Street. The socalled Tea Party movement that's gradually taking over the Republican Party began when President George W. Bush and, after him, President Obama provided Wall Street with $700 billion. It looked and felt like an insider job, a rigged deal to many Americans. In the US, when there is a sense that government and business are in cahoots, the tendency is to blame government rather than business. Had Obama put very strict conditions on that bailout, requiring for example, that Wall Street firms lend to small businesses, that homeowners be allowed to reorganize their mortgage debts under personal bankruptcy, that they limited their own pay, I don't think we would have had the kind of reaction we did. Obama also failed to connect the dots, showing America that the financial reform bill, the health care bill, and the jobs bill, the stimulus package, were all part of a broader effort to restore the middle class and fairness in the American economy.


SPIEGEL ONLINE: It is easy to blame the politicians. But what about the American consumers? They went on a spending spree -- and should have known better.
Reich: The American economy has grown tically over the last three decades, but median wages have barely grown at all. Median family incomes have grown slightly but only because women have gone into the paid workforce in great numbers, because everyone was working longer and because people had more disposable income to the extent that they could borrow. Now we're in trouble because all of those coping mechanisms, as I call them, are exhausted. When so much income goes to the top, the vast middle class and working class simply don't have enough money to buy all the things the economy is capable of producing without going deep into debt, and that debt bubble cannot be sustained. To suggest that the problem is that American consumers spent beyond their means begs a far more fundamental question: Why didn't their means increase as the economy increased in size tically. We have not seen such a large gap between the top and the bottom since 1929 and you know what happened then.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: In addition to the Great Depression, there was also a sharp increase in the amount of national rage, both with politicians and within the political debate. Could that happen again?
Reich: I think what we're seeing now in America is an outbreak of isolationism, nativism, and xenophobia. The Tea Party is against foreign trade. We are also seeing an outbreak of anti immigrant sentiment across the country. The anger directed at China now is out of proportion to China's real effect on the American economy. China is not to blame for 15 million jobs being lost over the last two and a half years. My point is that we are already seeing the hallmarks of the politics of anger and resentment, which led in the 1930s to isolationism. That's very much what worries me.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: On the other hand, the angry debates back then ushered in significant reforms. Can that happen again?
Reich:
That is the big question whether we will adopt reforms of a similar nature to the reforms we adopted in the 1930s, '40s, '50s and '60s -- reforms that tically expanded opportunity and also public investments in education and infrastructure. We then had 30 percent of our population in trade unions. Now it's fewer than 8 percent. Then we had a marginal income tax on the highest earners of 91 percent, now the marginal income tax on highest earners is 36 percent, but the super rich have managed to exploit a loophole in which much of their income is treated as capital gains and, therefore, subject to only a 15 percent tax.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: When you served in the White House, President Bill Clinton began on the left but drifted to the middle after the Democrats lost significant ground in the mid-term elections. Do you see that happening again?

Reich: I was there with Bill Clinton when he tried to so called "triangulate" and please the voters in the middle. But the middle is a fiction. The middle is simply where most voters who respond to surveys say they are. What Clinton did and what Obama may be forced to do is to give up leadership; that is, to simply respond to polls. I think it would be a shame if Obama moved from leadership to opinion polls, but his advisers may feel that that's the only way to guarantee him a re-election.


http://www.spiegel.de/international/...726575,00.html
Yetti,

Do you actually beleive this bullshit? I know you got this from the uaw website or was it posted in the lunch room WTF
pizzaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > General 4x4 Stuff > Politics, Government, or Religion Chat

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright 2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Page generated in 0.35361 seconds with 59 queries