Term Limit Poll - Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest

Go Back   Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > General 4x4 Stuff > Politics, Government, or Religion Chat
GL4x4 Live! GL4x4 Casino

Politics, Government, or Religion Chat Bring your flamesuit!

greatlakes4x4.com is the premier Great Lakes 4x4 Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Search
View Poll Results: Do you support Term Limits?
Yes 26 81.25%
No 4 12.50%
6 years excluding Presidency 0 0%
8 years excluding Presidency 5 15.63%
10 years excluding Presidency 0 0%
10 years total excluding 2nd Term Presidency 0 0%
12 years total excluding 2nd Term Presidency 1 3.13%
Other. Specify 1 3.13%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 7th, 2009, 01:04 PM   #1
deuce228
Redneck Poser
 
deuce228's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-07-05
Location: West Branch, MI
Posts: 7,971
iTrader: (8)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default Term Limit Poll

I want to see what kind of support there is for political term limits.

Simple Yes or No poll but I am adding ability for multiple choice. While it make skew the yes/no answers if people want to screw around it would allow more specific answers.

I am refering to length of time allowed in Federal politics. Senate, Congress, & Presidency.

Last edited by deuce228; August 7th, 2009 at 01:11 PM.
deuce228 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old August 7th, 2009, 01:18 PM   #2
poweraman
aces 4x4 club
 
poweraman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-03-08
Location: dorr, sandy pines, mi
Posts: 247
iTrader: (0)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

you must have term limits, to many people vote for idiots
poweraman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 7th, 2009, 01:19 PM   #3
XXXJ
Desert Rat
 
XXXJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-09-07
Location: Memphis, Mi
Posts: 5,671
iTrader: (13)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Default

End carrer politics.
It should be done as a service to your country, then get on with your life.
XXXJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 7th, 2009, 01:53 PM   #4
deuce228
Redneck Poser
 
deuce228's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-07-05
Location: West Branch, MI
Posts: 7,971
iTrader: (8)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XXXJ View Post
End carrer politics.
It should be done as a service to your country, then get on with your life.
That's pretty much what I am trying gage.
deuce228 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 7th, 2009, 01:56 PM   #5
WSU JK
Senior Member
 
WSU JK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-25-08
Location: Lowering the Per-Capita Income of Bloomfield Hills since 2009!
Posts: 2,650
iTrader: (4)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Default

I voted "NO" but I support them for the position of the Presidency.

Yes, people have a tendency to keep voting some of the same idiots into office but there is some good to be said about having representatives who have been in their positions for a while and know how to get things done and specifically get things done for their constituents. And when our representatives do happen to get something right, why reward them with making them leave office?

It can also take years to learn how deals get done and to see certain projects make it through the pipeline. By forcing somebody out office after just a couple of terms, you run the risk of having zero consistency in policy focus over relatively short periods of time; it would also hurt that the politicians (and their staffs) would have a difficult time forming meaningful long-term working relationships with other representatives. Businesses like to consistency regarding a policy focus in Washington D.C. as well; it helps them prepare for the long term and plan for growth.

Of course, as somebody with degrees in policy, political science, and economics (more education than brains as I freely admit) I don't necessarily look at somebody being a career politician as a bad thing.
WSU JK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 7th, 2009, 02:05 PM   #6
deuce228
Redneck Poser
 
deuce228's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-07-05
Location: West Branch, MI
Posts: 7,971
iTrader: (8)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WSU JK View Post
I voted "NO" but I support them for the position of the Presidency.

Yes, people have a tendency to keep voting some of the same idiots into office but there is some good to be said about having representatives who have been in their positions for a while and know how to get things done and specifically get things done for their constituents. And when our representatives do happen to get something right, why reward them with making them leave office?

It can also take years to learn how deals get done and to see certain projects make it through the pipeline. By forcing somebody out office after just a couple of terms, you run the risk of having zero consistency in policy focus over relatively short periods of time; it would also hurt that the politicians (and their staffs) would have a difficult time forming meaningful long-term working relationships with other representatives. Businesses like to consistency regarding a policy focus in Washington D.C. as well; it helps them prepare for the long term and plan for growth.

Of course, as somebody with degrees in policy, political science, and economics (more education than brains as I freely admit) I don't necessarily look at somebody being a career politician as a bad thing.
I wonder if it takes years to learn how to do it because we have allowed career politicians to make it so. Then folks such as yourself feel that it may be required to get things done.

I also wonder how long after putting limits on how long the folks can dance around capital hill it will be before significant changes in policies. They simply won't have time to fart around over and over again with the same bullshit and may be tempted to try harder the first time.
deuce228 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 7th, 2009, 02:10 PM   #7
amc78cj7
Senior Member
 
amc78cj7's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-07-05
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,354
iTrader: (9)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Without term limits, politicians vote primarily to support their next re-election campaign (ie why lobby groups with cash in hand have too much influence on our country).
__________________
I'm not quoting idiots who promote unsafe recovery strap techniques anymore. :miff:
amc78cj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 7th, 2009, 02:12 PM   #8
deuce228
Redneck Poser
 
deuce228's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-07-05
Location: West Branch, MI
Posts: 7,971
iTrader: (8)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amc78cj7 View Post
Without term limits, politicians vote primarily to support their next re-election campaign (ie why lobby groups with cash in hand have too much influence on our country).
Exactly. Cut out the amount of time for the lobbyists to get in their pockets and perhaps they will actually vote on their own values.
deuce228 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 7th, 2009, 02:52 PM   #9
ScOoTeR
hoo dat. wat.
 
ScOoTeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-09-05
Location: Howell
Posts: 21,607
iTrader: (36)
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Default

Other.

p3n15.
__________________
@clarkstoncracker
ScOoTeR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 7th, 2009, 03:03 PM   #10
steveo
In the band!
 
Join Date: 03-30-07
Location: montana/wyoming
Posts: 20,293
iTrader: (6)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

To be a politician you should be required to have served and you can serve a length equal to your time in the service. to be able to vote you should be required to serve. my 2 cents.
steveo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 7th, 2009, 03:43 PM   #11
mideerslayer
NEVER GIVE UP!
 
mideerslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-06
Location: Clinton Township
Posts: 3,865
iTrader: (30)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

they should have a age limit also

That ass hat John dingle is 81, half crippled can hardly talk, and he is there to rep for Michigan? Go retire you old fuk



The same old news is stale and boring news, do you read the same book or newspaper everyday?? They want change in Washington well this is a way, I think 8 years and out is good. Fresh blood turns over a new leaf, get some different opinions and eyes in the situation. What worked for you in 1952 might not be how people feel in 2009
mideerslayer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 7th, 2009, 09:14 PM   #12
traveller
Senior Member
 
traveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-01-09
Location: williamston mi
Posts: 536
iTrader: (3)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

8 years Pres.
12 years everyone else
traveller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 7th, 2009, 09:57 PM   #13
brewmenn
Grumpy old man.
 
brewmenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: Inkster, MI
Posts: 10,586
iTrader: (9)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deuce228 View Post
Exactly. Cut out the amount of time for the lobbyists to get in their pockets and perhaps they will actually vote on their own values.
Or maybe it would make them work even harder to get lobbyists into their pockets quicker, and make sure they can get that good paying job when they have to leave office. Also, once they get into their final term of office wheres the motivation to do what their constituents want?
brewmenn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 7th, 2009, 10:00 PM   #14
brewmenn
Grumpy old man.
 
brewmenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: Inkster, MI
Posts: 10,586
iTrader: (9)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Default

I think it's sad that we need term limits. In the perfect world it should be completely unnecessary, because if someone wasn't doing a good job the people would vote him out, and if he was doing a good job they'd want him to stay there and keep doing it as long as possible.
brewmenn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 7th, 2009, 10:40 PM   #15
Nvrenuf
Senior Member
 
Nvrenuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-05
Location: Freeland MI
Posts: 489
iTrader: (20)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

I have worked with/in many different government offices from local to federal level. I find the people behind the officials are the worst. They hamper progress the most and save their sacred budgets. If term limits are in place these people gain even more power and control.
Nvrenuf is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply
Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > General 4x4 Stuff > Politics, Government, or Religion Chat

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright 2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Page generated in 0.24803 seconds with 66 queries