Go Back   Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > 4x4 Talk > Rig Builds and Pics
GL4x4 Live! GL4x4 Casino

Rig Builds and Pics Introduce your rig or post a buildup here.







Search
View Poll Results: Square or tube stock??
1 1/2" Sqaure stock 3 25.00%
1 1/2" tube stock 9 75.00%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 24th, 2008, 11:45 AM   #1
PCK_4xCustoms
r00t4r3d
 
PCK_4xCustoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-20-08
Location: livonia
Posts: 1,912
iTrader: (5)
Send a message via AIM to PCK_4xCustoms
Truggy Project

Lookin into building a buggy of sorts off of a '93 F150 frame section (motor/trans/tcase)

Plan is to build a cage off the pre-existing frame segment, not the whole frame, and the debate is sqaure stock or tube?

Looking for opinion only tyvm haha

1 1/2" material for either square or round.

It will be well triangulated so no worries
PCK_4xCustoms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24th, 2008, 11:54 AM   #2
DUNE JUMP
...
 
DUNE JUMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-29-06
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,221
iTrader: (22)
tube it up
DUNE JUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24th, 2008, 12:16 PM   #3
Hacksaw
WWSD - What would stan do
 
Hacksaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-04-05
Location: Isle Of TREASURE, FL
Posts: 11,178
iTrader: (5)
round.
Hacksaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24th, 2008, 12:18 PM   #4
brimy311
Smells like a Fork Liftis
 
brimy311's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: Kzoo, mi
Posts: 4,092
iTrader: (42)
Send a message via AIM to brimy311
1 1/2" Round tube is too small for a big rig. I would recommend 1 3/4" tube (round).
__________________
JcrOffroad.com
Like us on Faceook!
brimy311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24th, 2008, 12:27 PM   #5
Haggar
Covered in mud...
 
Haggar's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-06-05
Location: Oxford, MI
Posts: 17,385
iTrader: (52)
Quote:
Originally Posted by brimy311 View Post
1 1/2" Round tube is too small for a big rig. I would recommend 1 3/4" tube (round).
x2

Big jump in strength to go to 1.75", and 1.5" will just look funny. Square would look terrible.
Haggar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24th, 2008, 12:51 PM   #6
95geo
newbie
 
95geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: dryden
Posts: 5,774
iTrader: (6)
2.0" round tube.
95geo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24th, 2008, 12:52 PM   #7
DUNE JUMP
...
 
DUNE JUMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-29-06
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,221
iTrader: (22)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 95geo View Post
2.0" round tube.
X2, just ask firehawk
DUNE JUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24th, 2008, 07:56 PM   #8
Mclovin
"The Situation"
 
Mclovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-07-05
Location: Dearborn Heights, Mi
Posts: 14,390
iTrader: (15)
Send a message via AIM to Mclovin Send a message via Yahoo to Mclovin
1 3/4 .120 wall
Mclovin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24th, 2008, 07:59 PM   #9
jimhri
Senior Member
 
jimhri's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-17-07
Location: north of a bankrupt city
Posts: 3,037
iTrader: (3)
1 vote for a railroad tie
jimhri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24th, 2008, 09:04 PM   #10
Fullsize4life
Kicking Cancers ASS
 
Fullsize4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-06
Location: Hart, Mi (next to silver lake)
Posts: 18,757
iTrader: (7)
What bout some conduit?
Fullsize4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24th, 2008, 09:09 PM   #11
curt1656
Praise the lowered
 
curt1656's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-26-07
Location: WTFWJD?
Posts: 2,901
iTrader: (24)
PVC's way cheaper.
curt1656 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 28th, 2008, 04:59 AM   #12
VonDirt
Senior Member
 
VonDirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-10-06
Location: west side michigan
Posts: 629
iTrader: (19)
Quote:
It will be well triangulated so no worries
depends on how many triangles you want.

if your building to the same relative strength, "its six of one , half dozen of another"

the smaller diameter material and lighter wall means youll need more triangulation over shorter spans. ie. the maserati bird cage design of the early 60's. it had 1/2 - 3/4 and 1" running everywhere but it was the lightest most rigid thing out there at the time.

the larger dia material will go longer spans with less triangulation, which equals less joints (work) and less running feet of tube used - but not nessecerily less actual material by weight. IMHO bigger tubes look proportionally correct on a full size - but in the end it all comes down to the actual design and what you want it to do.
VonDirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 28th, 2008, 11:03 AM   #13
Rider 414
!CLUTCH!
 
Rider 414's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-14-07
Location: Garden City
Posts: 261
iTrader: (3)
Old Playground Swingset Tubing.
Rider 414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > 4x4 Talk > Rig Builds and Pics
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright 2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Cracker Enterprises - Powered by Linux
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=
Page generated in 0.12513 seconds with 37 queries