Go Back   Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > 4x4 Talk > Ford Tech
GL4x4 Live! GL4x4 Casino







Search
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 17th, 2008, 09:06 PM   #1
Jdc215
Senior Member
 
Jdc215's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-08
Location: Hartland/Fenton
Posts: 1,071
iTrader: (6)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Lightbulb Ranger Wheels

Does anybody know the specs on these wheels, especially back spacing.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	PICT0058.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	88.1 KB
ID:	33716  
Jdc215 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 17th, 2008, 09:10 PM   #2
88mudder
In the band!
 
Join Date: 03-30-06
Location: waterford michigan
Posts: 3,678
iTrader: (29)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to 88mudder Send a message via Skype™ to 88mudder
Default

im guessing 4" backspacing 15x7
88mudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 17th, 2008, 09:12 PM   #3
special k
Senior Member
 
special k's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-14-08
Location: South Lyon 48178
Posts: 3,090
iTrader: (38)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

the bp is 5x4.5
special k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 17th, 2008, 09:57 PM   #4
Jdc215
Senior Member
 
Jdc215's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-08
Location: Hartland/Fenton
Posts: 1,071
iTrader: (6)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

i currently have sometires mounted on a set of steel jeep cherokee wheels but they rub a little. i also have these stock wheels that came with the truck when i bought it. i was trying to figure out which wheels would mount the tires further out. the cherokee wheels are the five spoke sttelie. i have a seto of 15x8 on the truck but i think an 8" wheel is too wide for these tires, they are very narrow.
Jdc215 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 17th, 2008, 10:07 PM   #5
88mudder
In the band!
 
Join Date: 03-30-06
Location: waterford michigan
Posts: 3,678
iTrader: (29)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to 88mudder Send a message via Skype™ to 88mudder
Default

where are u rubbing at ? I think XJ wheels stick out further, i think they are 3.75 BS
88mudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 17th, 2008, 10:12 PM   #6
Jdc215
Senior Member
 
Jdc215's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-08
Location: Hartland/Fenton
Posts: 1,071
iTrader: (6)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

not sure i havent had them on for quite a while. i just had them on a few times and assume that more space would reduce rubbing. i would guess on the radious arms but im not certain.
Jdc215 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 17th, 2008, 10:19 PM   #7
88mudder
In the band!
 
Join Date: 03-30-06
Location: waterford michigan
Posts: 3,678
iTrader: (29)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to 88mudder Send a message via Skype™ to 88mudder
Default

ive never owned a RBV that didn't rub the radius arms at full lock. If you dont want them to rub them your gonna need some insane wheels and narrow tires. I know stock Ranger wheels and tires rub at full lock. James Duff radius arms are angled in the middle and tires wont rub them.
88mudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 17th, 2008, 10:40 PM   #8
Jdc215
Senior Member
 
Jdc215's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-18-08
Location: Hartland/Fenton
Posts: 1,071
iTrader: (6)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

these tires are like 31x8-15. like i said i want them on the wheels that will cause the least rubbing.
Jdc215 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > 4x4 Talk > Ford Tech
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright 2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Cracker Enterprises - Powered by Linux
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=
Page generated in 0.08736 seconds with 27 queries