Go Back   Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > General 4x4 Stuff > Politics, Government, or Religion Chat
GL4x4 Live! GL4x4 Casino

Politics, Government, or Religion Chat Bring your flamesuit!







Search
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 18th, 2007, 06:15 AM   #61
Rattler
Home Sweet Homicide
 
Rattler's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-17-06
Location: Bei City
Posts: 3,647
iTrader: (1)
I do think we need to cut back on petro use and develop something else. To be honest, I wonder WTF is taking it so long. We should have cars capable of 50+ mpg with all the technology out there.

I don't think the Earth is getting warmer though. We were all gonna freeze 20 years ago.
Rattler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 18th, 2007, 09:26 AM   #62
mistertwisty
twisted 4wheeler
 
mistertwisty's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-16-07
Location: Garden City
Posts: 60
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rattler View Post
I do think we need to cut back on petro use and develop something else. To be honest, I wonder WTF is taking it so long. We should have cars capable of 50+ mpg with all the technology out there.
simple, BIG OIL with BIG MONEY. They will play the game as long as the resource is available, and then worry about the next big thing. At this point they have so much power over the way business spends thier resources that they can charge however much they want for fuel under the guise of supply/demand. There is a good reason no new refineries are being built, there is no money in it for big oil. If they increase the supply the price will go down, and what accountant at what oil company thinks that is a good idea?

In the meantime, I will drive my V-8 at about 5mph slower on the e-way to gain about 2-3 mpg, but that is for my pocketbook, not some myth about the world getting too hot. (btw my jeep gets better mileage with a V-8 than my windstar did with a V-6, put that in your hippie pipe and smoke it )
mistertwisty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 18th, 2007, 11:37 AM   #63
3-foot
Senior Member
 
3-foot's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-21-06
Location: Springfield Township, Mi
Posts: 1,108
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistertwisty View Post
simple, BIG OIL with BIG MONEY. They will play the game as long as the resource is available, and then worry about the next big thing. At this point they have so much power over the way business spends thier resources that they can charge however much they want for fuel under the guise of supply/demand. There is a good reason no new refineries are being built, there is no money in it for big oil. If they increase the supply the price will go down, and what accountant at what oil company thinks that is a good idea?

In the meantime, I will drive my V-8 at about 5mph slower on the e-way to gain about 2-3 mpg, but that is for my pocketbook, not some myth about the world getting too hot. (btw my jeep gets better mileage with a V-8 than my windstar did with a V-6, put that in your hippie pipe and smoke it )
There is so much inaccurate information in this post I don't know where to start!

1) How does "Big Oil" have control over other businesses spend their resources?

Answer: They don't.

2) If they can charge "whatever they want" why aren't they charging a billion dollars a gallon?

Answer: Competition within a free market limits the price.

3) Supply and demand isn't a guise, it's one result of a free market.

4) Refineries aren't being built because of Government restrictions. Restrictions that are in place because of lobbying envronmentalists & the NIMBY crowd.

I'd say that more refineries will increase demand, not supply, because it will increase available gas supplies, the price will go down, and people will stop buying diesels and hybrids and start burning more gas.

Raising the price of something doesn't always result in more profit. It can very likely result in loss of customers and less profit.



Sorry, but you swallowed the hippie pipe and all the b.s. that was packed inside.

Go read "Basic Econmics" by Thomas Sowell, it will explain the truth to you better than I ever could.
3-foot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 18th, 2007, 11:41 AM   #64
zjkid
Senior Member
 
zjkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-18-07
Location: EL
Posts: 3,928
iTrader: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3-foot View Post
There is so much inaccurate information in this post I don't know where to start!

1) How does "Big Oil" have control over other businesses spend their resources?

Answer: They don't.

2) If they can charge "whatever they want" why aren't they charging a billion dollars a gallon?

Answer: Competition within a free market limits the price.

3) Supply and demand isn't a guise, it's one result of a free market.

4) Refineries aren't being built because of Government restrictions. Restrictions that are in place because of lobbying envronmentalists & the NIMBY crowd.

I'd say that more refineries will increase demand, not supply, because it will increase available gas supplies, the price will go down, and people will stop buying diesels and hybrids and start burning more gas.

Raising the price of something doesn't always result in more profit. It can very likely result in loss of customers and less profit.



Sorry, but you swallowed the hippie pipe and all the b.s. that was packed inside.

Go read "Basic Econmics" by Thomas Sowell, it will explain the truth to you better than I ever could.
I dont really think if more refineries are built that the demand will increase that much. Its always gonna increase b/c more people are driving everyday, but at $3 a gal. people havent cut back a whole lot, maybe just a bit.
zjkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 18th, 2007, 12:28 PM   #65
scottie
American Leyland??
 
scottie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: Sweet home Georgia on my mind
Posts: 8,481
iTrader: (2)
Send a message via AIM to scottie
the reason why we don't have 50+ mpg cars is because people don't buy them.

their were several models in the early 90's/late 80's that could get near 50 mpg, but nobody bought them because gas was cheap, then in the late 90's gas was practically free. fuel efficient cars are typically slow, small wedges that people are afraid to be seen in.

then there is the whole world of safety, that a lot of times the easiest way for a car to meet safety specs is to throw more weight at it and people want their cars to be quiet(more weight), they want aircondtioning (more weight and more fuel burned).

its not that they can't make 50 mpg cars, its that nobody wants them(in the US), but that might change soon. and as always import car makes well lead the way, because thats what they have always been doing is building fuel efficient cars.
scottie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 18th, 2007, 01:17 PM   #66
zjkid
Senior Member
 
zjkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-18-07
Location: EL
Posts: 3,928
iTrader: (2)
The imports will probably have the small car market but the truck market will be dominated by the US for a little longer at least. Since imports dont make as good a truck and US trucks get better mpg.
zjkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 18th, 2007, 02:24 PM   #67
Rattler
Home Sweet Homicide
 
Rattler's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-17-06
Location: Bei City
Posts: 3,647
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottie View Post
the reason why we don't have 50+ mpg cars is because people don't buy them.

their were several models in the early 90's/late 80's that could get near 50 mpg, but nobody bought them because gas was cheap, then in the late 90's gas was practically free. fuel efficient cars are typically slow, small wedges that people are afraid to be seen in.

then there is the whole world of safety, that a lot of times the easiest way for a car to meet safety specs is to throw more weight at it and people want their cars to be quiet(more weight), they want aircondtioning (more weight and more fuel burned).

its not that they can't make 50 mpg cars, its that nobody wants them(in the US), but that might change soon. and as always import car makes well lead the way, because thats what they have always been doing is building fuel efficient cars.
Csaba Csere in Car & Driver did an editorial a while back about something similar. He compared the Honda Civic of the late 70s to the latest one telling how much weight its gained over the years without any real improvement in mileage.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zjkid View Post
The imports will probably have the small car market but the truck market will be dominated by the US for a little longer at least. Since imports dont make as good a truck and US trucks get better mpg.
I hope you mean the full-size market. I looked at a new Colorado Crew Cab 4x4 and ended up buying a used Toyota DoubleCab. I would have paid the same for the new Colorado with my discount but no thanks. I plan on keeping the truck for quite a while. Plus there is really no aftermarket for the Colorado/Canyon.
Rattler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 18th, 2007, 08:21 PM   #68
C.K.
Dont Feed the Cyco
 
C.K.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: 48386
Posts: 17,298
iTrader: (21)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 95geo View Post
i have always wanted to live in a warmer area.... if it comes to Michigan without me having to relocate then im all for it.
No shit. I wonder if any of these global warming nuts have ever visited MI in February.
C.K. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 18th, 2007, 08:23 PM   #69
Rattler
Home Sweet Homicide
 
Rattler's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-17-06
Location: Bei City
Posts: 3,647
iTrader: (1)
Wasn't there a global warming summit/meeting cancelled this year due to snow?
Rattler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 18th, 2007, 11:30 PM   #70
scottie
American Leyland??
 
scottie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: Sweet home Georgia on my mind
Posts: 8,481
iTrader: (2)
Send a message via AIM to scottie
i also pee outside now, saves water from being flushed adds nutrients to the soil, etc
scottie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2007, 01:53 PM   #71
busyfixin
Balls Deep
 
busyfixin's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-24-06
Location: williamsburg, MI
Posts: 3,120
iTrader: (11)
i try do have as many diesels as possible. power and milage are cool.

E-85 from corn is BS. corn is about the biggest feeder out there. corn will deplete the nutrients from the soil in just a couple years. thats why farmers move their corn fields every year. if you think fuels made from corn are saving the earth and reducing fossil fuel usage, look into how many fossil fuels are used in the manufacturing of the fertilizers needed to make corn grow well. soy beans are a much better bet, as they put nutrients back into the ground. too bad soy beans arent worth what corn is. farmers dont plant crops to be enviromental, they plant crops to make money, using fossil fertilizers dont matter.

diesel vehicles however are always more efficient, as there is more power in a gallon of diesel, as there is in gasoline. diesel also takes less to refine it, using even less fossil fuels.

oh, and i jet-ski/snowmobile/ride quads as often as possible, just trying to celebrate our victory over global cooling just a few years ago.
busyfixin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2007, 02:00 PM   #72
Rattler
Home Sweet Homicide
 
Rattler's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-17-06
Location: Bei City
Posts: 3,647
iTrader: (1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by busyfixin View Post
oh, and i jet-ski/snowmobile/ride quads as often as possible, just trying to celebrate our victory over global cooling just a few years ago.


My sis worked for the Michigan Soy Bean Coop years ago. Her boss has always had a diesel truck that would run on soy diesel.
Rattler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 27th, 2007, 03:07 PM   #73
mdhmi
Senior Member
 
mdhmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-08-07
Location: West Side
Posts: 272
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewmenn View Post
so what are you doing about global warning
Complaining about the fuel costs in my SUV. :gman:
mdhmi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 28th, 2007, 11:00 AM   #74
ScOoTeR
GLFWDA Member #07520
 
ScOoTeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-09-05
Location: Howell
Posts: 21,222
iTrader: (35)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottie View Post
the reason why we don't have 50+ mpg cars is because people don't buy them.

their were several models in the early 90's/late 80's that could get near 50 mpg, but nobody bought them because gas was cheap, then in the late 90's gas was practically free. fuel efficient cars are typically slow, small wedges that people are afraid to be seen in.

then there is the whole world of safety, that a lot of times the easiest way for a car to meet safety specs is to throw more weight at it and people want their cars to be quiet(more weight), they want aircondtioning (more weight and more fuel burned).

its not that they can't make 50 mpg cars, its that nobody wants them(in the US), but that might change soon. and as always import car makes well lead the way, because thats what they have always been doing is building fuel efficient cars.
Scottie - fantastic post.
ScOoTeR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 28th, 2007, 12:45 PM   #75
High Center Hancho
rack tap re-rack click
 
High Center Hancho's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-10-07
Location: Genesee County
Posts: 12,395
iTrader: (40)
I've been pissing on my neighbors plants and trees in an effort to kill them. I think the globe needs to warm up so we don't have any more winters...those suck
High Center Hancho is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > General 4x4 Stuff > Politics, Government, or Religion Chat
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright 2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Cracker Enterprises - Powered by Linux
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=
Page generated in 0.22763 seconds with 42 queries