Front locker - Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest

Go Back   Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > 4x4 Talk > 4x4 Product reviews and how-to's
GL4x4 Live! GL4x4 Casino

greatlakes4x4.com is the premier Great Lakes 4x4 Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Search
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 22nd, 2014, 09:35 AM   #1
Wramblerguy
Senior Member
 
Wramblerguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-02-11
Location: Schoolcraft 49087
Posts: 3,281
iTrader: (10)
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Default Front locker

So I currently am running a trutrac in my front 44 and love it on the street and mild wheeling but hate it as soon as the wheeling gets mild or worse
I was wondering what everyone's exsperience is on front lockers
I've been planing on upgrading to a full Detroit
What are my other options for scull case automatic locker?
__________________
3rd generation jeeper

99 gmc Sierra extended cab z71 dd
87 yj Laredo 4.2/999/231 ac & cruise bone stock (for now)
90s Wrambler efi 2.5, t5, sye231 ,d44s with 4.88s and detroits
Wramblerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old January 22nd, 2014, 11:37 AM   #2
Wehan
Senior Member
 
Wehan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-07-06
Location: Charlotte, MI
Posts: 2,596
iTrader: (25)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Default

Yukon Grizzly Locker

I run an Aussie lunchbox in the front of my wrangler, it's invisible in 2wd, in 4x4 there is a steep learning curve in the snow/mud but the Detroit in the rear doesn't help that learning curve much. I would highly consider a Selectable locker for the front from my experience and if mine wasn't going in a Dana 30 I would have went with one to.
__________________

Last edited by Wehan; January 22nd, 2014 at 11:52 AM.
Wehan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 22nd, 2014, 12:30 PM   #3
Wramblerguy
Senior Member
 
Wramblerguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-02-11
Location: Schoolcraft 49087
Posts: 3,281
iTrader: (10)
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Default

I don't want to spend the money for an ox
And I don't want to buy a carrier to run a lunchbox locker
Is the grizzly easier to steer with then a Detroit?
__________________
3rd generation jeeper

99 gmc Sierra extended cab z71 dd
87 yj Laredo 4.2/999/231 ac & cruise bone stock (for now)
90s Wrambler efi 2.5, t5, sye231 ,d44s with 4.88s and detroits
Wramblerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 22nd, 2014, 01:09 PM   #4
Complete Off Road
4x4 Parts and Service
 
Complete Off Road's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-10
Location: Dubuque IA
Posts: 818
iTrader: (3)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wramblerguy View Post
I don't want to spend the money for an ox
And I don't want to buy a carrier to run a lunchbox locker
Is the grizzly easier to steer with then a Detroit?
the Grizzly and Detroit are based on the same concept, so operationally they are very similar.

And Yukon is so much easier to deal with if you do need to file a warranty.
__________________
Buy with confidence from the #1 Authorized Dealer of Yukon Gear and Axle Off Road Products

the ONLY Yukon Dealer to offer a COMPLETE Lifetime Warranty on ALL Yukon ring and pinion sets*

563-583-5363
Andy@CompleteOffroad.com


Use code "GL4X4" at checkout for 5% off SSC branded products at CompleteOffroad.com

Yukon, USA Standard, ARB, RCV, Warn, Currie, Bubba Rope, Master Pull, Trail Defense, and more
Authorized Yukon Dealer since 1998

Like us on Facebook!

*Yukon ring and pinion sets must be purchased at full retail price to be eligible for warranty
Complete Off Road is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 22nd, 2014, 04:58 PM   #5
Wramblerguy
Senior Member
 
Wramblerguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-02-11
Location: Schoolcraft 49087
Posts: 3,281
iTrader: (10)
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Complete Off Road View Post
the Grizzly and Detroit are based on the same concept, so operationally they are very similar.



And Yukon is so much easier to deal with if you do need to file a warranty.

So performance is prety much the same, price is about the same
The Yukon warranty is better or easier to use?
__________________
3rd generation jeeper

99 gmc Sierra extended cab z71 dd
87 yj Laredo 4.2/999/231 ac & cruise bone stock (for now)
90s Wrambler efi 2.5, t5, sye231 ,d44s with 4.88s and detroits
Wramblerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 22nd, 2014, 06:14 PM   #6
Complete Off Road
4x4 Parts and Service
 
Complete Off Road's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-10
Location: Dubuque IA
Posts: 818
iTrader: (3)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wramblerguy View Post
The Yukon warranty is better or easier to use?
Both. Here's some cut and paste action:

"Covers the replacement of the unit and any collaterally damaged parts and associated labor, up to $2,000.*
*Collaterally damaged parts must be submitted for inspection. Receipts for parts and associated labor must be submitted as well. Only claims deemed reasonable by Yukon Gear & Axle will be accepted. Offer may be discontinued without advance notice"

So that means they will replace the locker and give you some cash for parts that may have broken when the locker failed. This 'collateral damage' is a somewhat common issue with the Detroits, and Yukon believes that their design reduces the chance of damage.

We sell both, and I know guys that use both. Its just way easier dealing with Yukon for us.
__________________
Buy with confidence from the #1 Authorized Dealer of Yukon Gear and Axle Off Road Products

the ONLY Yukon Dealer to offer a COMPLETE Lifetime Warranty on ALL Yukon ring and pinion sets*

563-583-5363
Andy@CompleteOffroad.com


Use code "GL4X4" at checkout for 5% off SSC branded products at CompleteOffroad.com

Yukon, USA Standard, ARB, RCV, Warn, Currie, Bubba Rope, Master Pull, Trail Defense, and more
Authorized Yukon Dealer since 1998

Like us on Facebook!

*Yukon ring and pinion sets must be purchased at full retail price to be eligible for warranty
Complete Off Road is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 22nd, 2014, 07:09 PM   #7
Wramblerguy
Senior Member
 
Wramblerguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-02-11
Location: Schoolcraft 49087
Posts: 3,281
iTrader: (10)
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Complete Off Road View Post
Both. Here's some cut and paste action:



"Covers the replacement of the unit and any collaterally damaged parts and associated labor, up to $2,000.*

*Collaterally damaged parts must be submitted for inspection. Receipts for parts and associated labor must be submitted as well. Only claims deemed reasonable by Yukon Gear & Axle will be accepted. Offer may be discontinued without advance notice"



So that means they will replace the locker and give you some cash for parts that may have broken when the locker failed. This 'collateral damage' is a somewhat common issue with the Detroits, and Yukon believes that their design reduces the chance of damage.



We sell both, and I know guys that use both. Its just way easier dealing with Yukon for us.

We'll if it comes to buying a new locker maybe I'll go with a grizzly
I am planning on running Yukon shafts in the future anyway so that would make warranties that much easier
__________________
3rd generation jeeper

99 gmc Sierra extended cab z71 dd
87 yj Laredo 4.2/999/231 ac & cruise bone stock (for now)
90s Wrambler efi 2.5, t5, sye231 ,d44s with 4.88s and detroits
Wramblerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > 4x4 Talk > 4x4 Product reviews and how-to's

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright 2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Page generated in 0.18092 seconds with 42 queries