Go Back   Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > 4x4 Talk > Chevy Tech
GL4x4 Live! GL4x4 Casino







Search
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 23rd, 2013, 09:37 AM   #1
swampjeep
Swamp Stomper
 
swampjeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: Waterford, mi
Posts: 7,655
iTrader: (25)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Default proform roller rockers?

I have a new to me K5 blazer with a supposed rebuilt 350 in it.

first trip to the dunes this past weekend, pushrod broke through a rocker arm

I'mm thinking who knows how old or worn the rest of the rockers are so might be a good idea to just buy a set and upgrade to rollers.

any one know how there are?
http://www.jegs.com/i/Proform/778/66927C/10002/-1

this is just a basic 350, suppose to be rebuild as stock, bored .030" over, with slightly bigger then stock cam, stock TBI system. With valve cover off, it looks like the heads are pretty clean, so it' is possible.
swampjeep is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2013, 10:22 AM   #2
koochman450r
Stranger Danger
 
koochman450r's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-13-08
Location: New Boston MI
Posts: 2,359
iTrader: (24)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Those would be better than factory. Not great, but better. If it has a bigger cam in it and not much else done to it I wouldn't get the 1.6 arms. Stick with 1.5. Stock valve springs, larger cam and increase rocker ratio could cause some valve float at lower rpms than with factory ratio.
__________________
MY BUILD
http://www.greatlakes4x4.com/showthread.php?t=255953
Quote:
Originally Posted by clarkstoncracker View Post
you won this battle.
koochman450r is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2013, 11:17 AM   #3
swampjeep
Swamp Stomper
 
swampjeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: Waterford, mi
Posts: 7,655
iTrader: (25)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Default

just better then factory is good enough for me, problem on the 1.5 vs 1.6 is I have no ides the cam size, I was told "it's stock or just slightly bigger"

maybe I should just stay with 1.5's then,
swampjeep is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2013, 11:43 AM   #4
koochman450r
Stranger Danger
 
koochman450r's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-13-08
Location: New Boston MI
Posts: 2,359
iTrader: (24)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

I would just stay with the factory ratio. Factory valve sprigs don't like having to move a lot. The cam if its just a little bigger will be good enough. Plus if you don't know about the cam the lift might be too big for the 1.6. Factory sbc springs are only good for about .550 lift. More than that and they might bottom out. So mild cam plus increased ratio might blow out your lifters, bend a pushrod, mess up the valves, or break another rocker. 1.5 roller tip rockers and your golden. I would pull out the pushrods and make sure they are all straight too.
__________________
MY BUILD
http://www.greatlakes4x4.com/showthread.php?t=255953
Quote:
Originally Posted by clarkstoncracker View Post
you won this battle.
koochman450r is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2013, 11:50 AM   #5
swampjeep
Swamp Stomper
 
swampjeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: Waterford, mi
Posts: 7,655
iTrader: (25)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Default

thanks
swampjeep is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2013, 08:11 PM   #6
frdboy
Wishin' I waz fishin'
 
frdboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-29-06
Location: Grand Haven, MI
Posts: 10,449
iTrader: (24)
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Default

I don't like anything from proform.....junk
__________________
Cheap Thrills Off Road

2003 F-250 4X4 7.3 PSD Crew Cab

1971 Bronco

Last edited by frdboy; September 23rd, 2013 at 08:19 PM.
frdboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2013, 08:16 PM   #7
koochman450r
Stranger Danger
 
koochman450r's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-13-08
Location: New Boston MI
Posts: 2,359
iTrader: (24)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

The ones he posted were just roller tips. So the stamped construction would clear factory covers.
__________________
MY BUILD
http://www.greatlakes4x4.com/showthread.php?t=255953
Quote:
Originally Posted by clarkstoncracker View Post
you won this battle.
koochman450r is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 23rd, 2013, 08:20 PM   #8
frdboy
Wishin' I waz fishin'
 
frdboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-29-06
Location: Grand Haven, MI
Posts: 10,449
iTrader: (24)
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by koochman450r View Post
The ones he posted were just roller tips. So the stamped construction would clear factory covers.
I should have clicked the link I guess

I fixed my post, thanks
__________________
Cheap Thrills Off Road

2003 F-250 4X4 7.3 PSD Crew Cab

1971 Bronco
frdboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 3rd, 2013, 08:05 AM   #9
Kodiak450r
Keep on truckin
 
Kodiak450r's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-14-07
Location: Waterford, MI
Posts: 5,909
iTrader: (19)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

I have the proform rockers on the 355 in my camaro. 25k miles on it and haven't had any issues. 6500 rpm rev limit and no failures. mine are full aluminum roller rockers 1.6 ratio.
Kodiak450r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 3rd, 2013, 10:39 AM   #10
Haggar
Covered in mud...
 
Haggar's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-06-05
Location: Oxford, MI
Posts: 17,549
iTrader: (54)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Default

How'd this go, I saw you guys working on the rockers last weekend :)
Haggar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > 4x4 Talk > Chevy Tech
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright 2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Cracker Enterprises - Powered by Linux
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=
Page generated in 0.10486 seconds with 32 queries