ls 5.3/6.0 vs 8.1/allison - Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest

Go Back   Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > 4x4 Talk > General Tech
GL4x4 Live! GL4x4 Casino

greatlakes4x4.com is the premier Great Lakes 4x4 Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Search
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 14th, 2013, 08:05 AM   #1
Red97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 02-04-10
Location: leslie
Posts: 447
iTrader: (8)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default ls 5.3/6.0 vs 8.1/allison

Just wanted some outside opinions on which direction to go with my sas 97 k1500. I am getting tired of the 305. quick specs of the truck, d60 front open,4.56 gears and 35 spline outers. 10.25 rear limited slip,disc brakes. built 4l60e/241 sye, with 1410 drive shafts all the way around. just a driver/dune truck.

what would you do?

5.3,cam,intake,headers,tune. Same with a 6.0

or a 8.1 with cam/headers/tune. With Allison/241 or 271?

want to know your thoughts.
Red97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old August 14th, 2013, 08:40 AM   #2
Haggar
Covered in mud...
 
Haggar's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-06-05
Location: Oxford, MI
Posts: 17,715
iTrader: (56)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Default

If its just for being a driver, then an iron 6.0 (LQ4 or LQ9) with a cam and tune would be my choice. Good power for the $$$, and should be an easy swap. If you've already got the 4L60e built up OK, I think it should work with the Gen III/IV. 97 should be PWM clutch control, and compatible electronics.

These are pretty easy to get to 425-450hp with the cam/headers/tune.
Haggar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 14th, 2013, 01:26 PM   #3
skife
Senior Member
 
skife's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-12-07
Location: cedar springs mi
Posts: 5,119
iTrader: (5)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to skife Send a message via MSN to skife
Default

i'll vote for the 5.3/6.0

easy to find
skife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 14th, 2013, 01:49 PM   #4
Wramblerguy
Senior Member
 
Wramblerguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-02-11
Location: Schoolcraft 49087
Posts: 3,276
iTrader: (10)
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Default

8.1 is an expensive motor to find/replace
I heard that all the internal parts are unique to the engine
6.0 all the way
__________________
3rd generation jeeper

99 gmc Sierra extended cab z71 dd
87 yj Laredo 4.2/999/231 ac & cruise bone stock (for now)
90s Wrambler efi 2.5, t5, sye231 ,d44s with 4.88s and detroits
Wramblerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 14th, 2013, 02:18 PM   #5
Red97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 02-04-10
Location: leslie
Posts: 447
iTrader: (8)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Ok, I have access to a 8.1 runs great but at 270k and the trans works but has issues. I would have to find a 5.3/6.0 but my trans and t case would work. I just cant get over the thought of a camed 496. Lol
Red97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 15th, 2013, 12:21 PM   #6
Haggar
Covered in mud...
 
Haggar's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-06-05
Location: Oxford, MI
Posts: 17,715
iTrader: (56)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wramblerguy View Post
8.1 is an expensive motor to find/replace
I heard that all the internal parts are unique to the engine
6.0 all the way
Yeah, 8.1s are limited parts, and not common with early big blocks.
Haggar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 15th, 2013, 08:20 PM   #7
Red97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 02-04-10
Location: leslie
Posts: 447
iTrader: (8)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

I thought the 8.1 was just a tall deck 454 with longer stroke and different heads? I was under the assumption all the internals were the same as vortec 454? I may be wrong though. How hard is it to get a 6.0 to get decent torque below 4000 rpm?
Red97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 18th, 2013, 07:43 PM   #8
1TFROT
Senior Member
 
1TFROT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-04-09
Location: chi-town
Posts: 1,379
iTrader: (0)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Default

my vote is for the 6.0, but I'm biased

love my lq4 out in the dunes or on the trails. makes nice power down low and rips all the way to 6k. it's cammed/tuned/headers

soon to get some head work done too

well built th350 behind mine

Last edited by 1TFROT; August 18th, 2013 at 08:28 PM.
1TFROT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 18th, 2013, 08:43 PM   #9
Haggar
Covered in mud...
 
Haggar's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-06-05
Location: Oxford, MI
Posts: 17,715
iTrader: (56)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red97 View Post
I thought the 8.1 was just a tall deck 454 with longer stroke and different heads? I was under the assumption all the internals were the same as vortec 454? I may be wrong though. How hard is it to get a 6.0 to get decent torque below 4000 rpm?
No.. difference firing order, different cam, different head bolt pattern, different intake ports, all metric fasteners, different oil pan, very limited aftermarket. Supposedly some of the aftermarket parts are for oil rigs that run these engines up to and over 600 cu in.

Probably 150-250 lbs lighter than an LS, depending on which block is chosen.

Proper camshaft and torque converter selection are going to be key to getting good powerband.
Haggar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > 4x4 Talk > General Tech

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright 2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Page generated in 0.18419 seconds with 48 queries