Go Back   Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > General 4x4 Stuff > The Pub
GL4x4 Live! GL4x4 Casino

The Pub A friendly forum where everybody is nice, and will answer any questions you have about life.







Search
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 16th, 2013, 07:21 AM   #1
clarkstoncracker
lol
 
clarkstoncracker's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-03-05
Location: OC - MI
Posts: 41,962
iTrader: (39)
Send a message via AIM to clarkstoncracker
Royal Oak requiring dangerous dog insurance starting today.

http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2013/05/...dog-insurance/


ROYAL OAK (WWJ) - Royal Oak is about to unleash new regulations on dog owners.

The new rules, which go into effect Thursday, require owners of “dangerous dogs” to carry $1 million in liability insurance, post signs, complete an obedience class with the dog, and keep the dog in a locked, fenced-in area. Owners must also comply with seven pages worth of other requirements to keep their pets in the city.

Officials say a dog is deemed dangerous if it bites or attacks a person, or causes serious injury to another domestic animal. Exceptions include dogs protecting an owner or a homeowner’s property.

City leaders say they created the ordinance after receiving 32 reports of dog bites and attacks during 2012 in Royal Oak.

Royal Oak resident John Scott said the ordinance is a good move for the city, putting the responsibility on the owners instead of the dogs.

“If you’re a dog owner, you know that dogs are protective of their territory. There’s an old saying that there’s no bad dogs, just bad owners,” he said.

Lori Wosnicki, who has a Bernese Mountain Dog, she understands the reason for the new ordinance, but still thinks that it goes too far.

“Look at this dog, who goes to schools and has kids lay all over him. I have a really hard time with [the ordinance] because how do you decide what’s dangerous,” she said.

Violation of the dog ordinance is a misdemeanor offense, punishable by a fine up to $500 and 90 days in jail.
__________________
clarkstoncracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 07:28 AM   #2
wave_crusher
I'll Direc your TV
 
wave_crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-20-09
Location: Big Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,643
iTrader: (20)
Seems like it's a bit to far to go for 32 reports in a year.

Although from the article it seems like it only applies to dogs that have already bitten another person or animal; unless they're claiming that any breed that bites then all of them are subject to the ordnance?????
wave_crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 07:34 AM   #3
kickstand
sHaMoNe!
 
kickstand's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-20-06
Location: fenton
Posts: 30,099
iTrader: (46)
Fuck Royal oak, that city is a shit hole filled with hipsters, liberals and yuppie douchebags
kickstand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 07:35 AM   #4
8PTBUCK
Yo
 
8PTBUCK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-02-09
Location: Waterford/Gladwin, MI
Posts: 4,220
iTrader: (6)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kickstand View Post
Fuck Royal oak, that city is a shit hole filled with hipsters, liberals and yuppie douchebags
x2
8PTBUCK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 07:40 AM   #5
clarkstoncracker
lol
 
clarkstoncracker's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-03-05
Location: OC - MI
Posts: 41,962
iTrader: (39)
Send a message via AIM to clarkstoncracker
Quote:
Originally Posted by wave_crusher View Post
Seems like it's a bit to far to go for 32 reports in a year.

Although from the article it seems like it only applies to dogs that have already bitten another person or animal; unless they're claiming that any breed that bites then all of them are subject to the ordnance?????
The interview I heard was more in depth. If you have a dog and it bites someone or another animal the owner will have the choice to put the dog down, or they must take out a $1,000,000 umbrella policy.

I agree with this law.
__________________
clarkstoncracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 07:44 AM   #6
revho
$9.00 vanilla malt
 
revho's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: beaverdam, mi
Posts: 2,318
iTrader: (5)
Maybe they can start mandating gun insurance as well.
revho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 07:46 AM   #7
Nuggets
Professional Pisser Offer
 
Nuggets's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 13,302
iTrader: (12)
I was in the D-rot area yesterday. I swear Detroit is Michigan's butthole.
Nuggets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 07:47 AM   #8
kickstand
sHaMoNe!
 
kickstand's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-20-06
Location: fenton
Posts: 30,099
iTrader: (46)
Quote:
Originally Posted by clarkstoncracker View Post
The interview I heard was more in depth. If you have a dog and it bites someone or another animal the owner will have the choice to put the dog down, or they must take out a $1,000,000 umbrella policy.

I agree with this law.
Yeah, I do too, I love it when the government mandates things.
kickstand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 07:48 AM   #9
8PTBUCK
Yo
 
8PTBUCK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-02-09
Location: Waterford/Gladwin, MI
Posts: 4,220
iTrader: (6)
who would buy a $1,000,000 umbrella???




I agree with this.
8PTBUCK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 07:49 AM   #10
fittergirl
Bird is my bitch
 
fittergirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-07-05
Location: Fowlerville area
Posts: 1,388
iTrader: (6)
The policy is only a couple hundred a year so it isn't as bad as most people think. I think the bite reports will go up drastically cause people will be looking for a payout after the neighbors poodle bites them.
fittergirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 07:52 AM   #11
Jiveturkey3
Senior Member
 
Jiveturkey3's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-22-12
Location: Hillsdale MI
Posts: 2,581
iTrader: (1)
Could one buy the insurance first, than let a trained attack loose on all those pesky joggers? I guess you should use up the one free bite it makes sense.
Jiveturkey3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 07:56 AM   #12
Spence1986
SlowBalt SS
 
Spence1986's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-07-05
Location: Redford Michigan
Posts: 2,435
iTrader: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Spence1986
My dogs have Liability Insurance along with health insurance. Whats the big deal?
Spence1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 08:00 AM   #13
SS
Sexing your Nancy, Dale!
 
SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-05
Location: Arlen, TX
Posts: 10,326
iTrader: (13)
I prefer the old way of people being held fully liable for the actions of their dog. Gives them incentive to properly train the dog.

Dog is dangerous. Dog bites person. Dog gets locked up for observation... possibly destroyed depending on severity of attack. Owner gets the living hell sued out of them. Lesson learned.
__________________
-Jeremy



Sticks and stones may break my bones but hollow points expand on impact.
SS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 08:03 AM   #14
Spence1986
SlowBalt SS
 
Spence1986's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-07-05
Location: Redford Michigan
Posts: 2,435
iTrader: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Spence1986
Quote:
Originally Posted by SS View Post
I prefer the old way of people being held fully liable for the actions of their dog. Gives them incentive to properly train the dog.

Dog is dangerous. Dog bites person. Dog gets locked up for observation... possibly destroyed depending on severity of attack. Owner gets the living hell sued out of them. Lesson learned.
Old? as in the last 5 years? haha
Spence1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 08:04 AM   #15
GreaseMonkey
Senior Member
 
GreaseMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-04-05
Location: Washington, MI
Posts: 17,872
iTrader: (22)
Can't wait until an ankle biter like a Chihuahua bites someone and then has to take out an insurance policy or be put down.

This has bad written all over it. Instead of harder punishments for those who don't train their dogs, someone has to come up with some other way that will cost everyone more that has a "potentially dangerous breed" that won't do jack shit of reducing any of those whopping 32 "attacks" that happened in Royal Oak last year.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerryann View Post
I am not a lesbian but if I was I would do her.
GreaseMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 08:06 AM   #16
SS
Sexing your Nancy, Dale!
 
SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-05
Location: Arlen, TX
Posts: 10,326
iTrader: (13)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spence1986 View Post
Old? as in the last 5 years? haha
Old as in the way things were done before this went into effect.
__________________
-Jeremy



Sticks and stones may break my bones but hollow points expand on impact.
SS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 08:08 AM   #17
Spence1986
SlowBalt SS
 
Spence1986's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-07-05
Location: Redford Michigan
Posts: 2,435
iTrader: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Spence1986
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreaseMonkey View Post
Can't wait until an ankle biter like a Chihuahua bites someone and then has to take out an insurance policy or be put down.

This has bad written all over it. Instead of harder punishments for those who don't train their dogs, someone has to come up with some other way that will cost everyone more that has a "potentially dangerous breed" that won't do jack shit of reducing any of those whopping 32 "attacks" that happened in Royal Oak last year.
I see it giving 30ish people a big pay check. Thats about it.
Spence1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 08:08 AM   #18
GreaseMonkey
Senior Member
 
GreaseMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-04-05
Location: Washington, MI
Posts: 17,872
iTrader: (22)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spence1986 View Post
I see it giving 30ish people a big pay check. Thats about it.
Yep. More than likely to the people that are fucktards who walk up to an owner with a dog and immediately try to pet the dog and then get nipped.

By the way, I'm in no way trying to dismiss the severity of the attacks that do occur from some dogs. I just don't see the point of a blanket policy that does little to curb the problem.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerryann View Post
I am not a lesbian but if I was I would do her.
GreaseMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 08:09 AM   #19
kickstand
sHaMoNe!
 
kickstand's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-20-06
Location: fenton
Posts: 30,099
iTrader: (46)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreaseMonkey View Post
Can't wait until an ankle biter like a Chihuahua bites someone and then has to take out an insurance policy or be put down.

This has bad written all over it. Instead of harder punishments for those who don't train their dogs, someone has to come up with some other way that will cost everyone more that has a "potentially dangerous breed" that won't do jack shit of reducing any of those whopping 32 "attacks" that happened in Royal Oak last year.
This.

Our sue happy insurance heavy litigation filled government mandated society would like to welcome you to the domecratic republic of communist royal oak.
kickstand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2013, 08:09 AM   #20
Spence1986
SlowBalt SS
 
Spence1986's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-07-05
Location: Redford Michigan
Posts: 2,435
iTrader: (1)
Send a message via AIM to Spence1986
Quote:
Originally Posted by SS View Post
Old as in the way things were done before this went into effect.
Didn't Home Owners cover stuff like this back in the day?
Spence1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > General 4x4 Stuff > The Pub
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2005 - 2012 Cracker Enterprises - Powered by Linux
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=
Page generated in 0.18295 seconds with 52 queries