Abuse of Power: Budget Reconciliation to pass ObamaCare - Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest

Go Back   Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > General 4x4 Stuff > Politics, Government, or Religion Chat
GL4x4 Live! GL4x4 Casino

Politics, Government, or Religion Chat Bring your flamesuit!

greatlakes4x4.com is the premier Great Lakes 4x4 Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Search
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 3rd, 2010, 07:41 AM   #1
RyeBread
Catch the wave
 
RyeBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-08-05
Location: Fenton
Posts: 7,946
iTrader: (2)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default Abuse of Power: Budget Reconciliation to pass ObamaCare

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...731862750.html

Abuse of Power
'An undemocratic disservice to our people and to the Senate's institutional role.'

A string of electoral defeats and the great unpopularity of ObamaCare can't stop Democrats from their self-appointed rendezvous with liberal destiny—ramming a bill through Congress on a narrow partisan vote. What we are about to witness is an extraordinary abuse of traditional Senate rules to pass a bill merely because they think it's good for the rest of us, and because they fear their chance to build a European welfare state may never come again.

The vehicle is "reconciliation," a parliamentary process that fast-tracks budget measures and was created in 1974 as a deficit-reduction tool. Limited to 20 hours of debate, reconciliation bills need a mere 50 votes in the Senate, with the Vice President as tie-breaker, thus circumventing the filibuster. Both Democrats and Republicans have frequently used reconciliation on budget bills, so Democrats are now claiming that using it to pass ObamaCare is no big deal.

Yet this shortcut has never been used for anything approaching the enormity of a national health-care entitlement. Democrats are only resorting to it now because their plan is in so much political trouble—within their own party, and even more among the general public—and because they've failed to make their case through persuasion.

"They know that this will take courage," Nancy Pelosi said in an interview over the weekend, speaking of the Members she'll try to strong-arm. "It took courage to pass Social Security. It took courage to pass Medicare," the Speaker continued. "But the American people need it, why are we here? We're not here just to self-perpetuate our service in Congress."

Leave aside the irony of invoking "the American people" on behalf of a bill that consistently has been 10 to 15 points underwater in every poll since the fall, and is getting more unpopular by the day, particularly among independents. As Maine Republican Olympia Snowe pointed out in a speech last December, Social Security passed when Democrats controlled both Congress and the White House, yet 64% of Senate Republicans and 79% of the House GOP voted for it. More than half of the Senate Republican caucus voted for Medicare in 1965. Historically, major social legislation has always been bipartisan, because it reflects a durable political consensus.

Reconciliation is the last mathematical gasp for ObamaCare because Democrats can't sell their policy to Senator Snowe, any other Republican, or even dozens of Democrats. This raw exercise of political power is of a piece with the copious corruption and bribery—such as the Cornhusker kickbacks and special tax benefits for union members—that liberals had to use to get even this far.

Democrats often point to welfare reform in 1996 as a reconciliation precedent, yet that bill passed the Senate with 78 votes, including Joe Biden and half of the Democratic caucus. The children's health insurance program in 1997 was steered through Congress with reconciliation, but it, too, was built on strong (if misguided) bipartisan support. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 that created Schip passed 85-15, including 43 Republicans. Even President Bush's 2001 tax cuts, another case in reconciliation point, were endorsed by 12 Senate Democrats.

The only precedent within historical shouting distance is Ronald Reagan's 1981 budget, which was controversial because it reshaped dozens of programs. But the Senate wasn't the problem—it ultimately passed the budget 80 to 14. The real dogfight was in the Democratically controlled House, where majority rules have always obtained, yet Reagan convinced 29 Democrats to buck Speaker Tip O'Neill. Reconciliation, in other words, wasn't used to subvert the 60-vote Senate threshold, but rather to grease the way for deficit reduction.

The process was designed for items that cut spending or affect tax revenue, to meet targets in the annual budget resolution. Democrats want to convert it into a jerry-rigged amendment process: That is, reconciliation wouldn't actually be used to pass ObamaCare per se. Instead, it would be used only to muscle through substantive changes to the bill that passed the Senate on Christmas Eve, without which 216 House Democrats won't vote for it. So Democrats would be writing amendments to current law that isn't in fact law at all—and can't become law without those amendments.

President Clinton preferred to use reconciliation to pass HillaryCare in the 1990s, but he was dissuaded by West Virginia Senator Robert Byrd, who argued that it would be an abuse of the process. Mr. Byrd, author of a four-volume history of Senate rules and procedures, told the Washington Post last March that "The misuse of the arcane process of reconciliation—a process intended for deficit reduction—to enact substantive policy changes is an undemocratic disservice to our people and to the Senate's institutional role," specifically citing health reform and cap and trade.

Regrets, they've got a few. Yet these Democratic Sinatras will still do it their way. President Obama is expected to endorse reconciliation in remarks this morning.

The goal is to permanently expand the American entitlement state with a vast apparatus of subsidies and regulations while the political window is still (barely) open, regardless of the consequences or the overwhelming popular condemnation. As Mr. Obama fatalistically said after his health summit, if voters don't like it, "then that's what elections are for."

In other words, he's volunteering Democrats in Congress to march into the fixed bayonets so he can claim an LBJ-level legacy like the Great Society that will be nearly impossible to repeal. This would be an unprecedented act of partisan arrogance that would further mark Democrats as the party of liberal extremism. If they think political passions are bitter now, wait until they pass ObamaCare.
RyeBread is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old March 3rd, 2010, 07:43 AM   #2
pizzaman
Senior Member
 
pizzaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: Independence Twsp, North Oakland County
Posts: 934
iTrader: (3)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

inbeforeleftwingliberalssay"the used it before"
pizzaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 3rd, 2010, 07:54 AM   #3
aber61
Senior Member
 
aber61's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-22-08
Location: Commerce Twp. Michigan
Posts: 6,085
iTrader: (3)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Default

If this is the way the do business when they are in power then it is time to vote them all out and change the rules.
Isn't there some about "We The People".
I really hope that the ones that voted for this administration are happy with how their vote is turning this country into a socialist state.
Big government only means less power for the people
aber61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 3rd, 2010, 07:58 AM   #4
mikesova
My 4x4 is a Subaru.
 
mikesova's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: Gladwin, MI
Posts: 7,784
iTrader: (1)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to mikesova
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pizzaman View Post
inbeforeleftwingliberalssay"the used it before"
is that not a fair retort?
mikesova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 3rd, 2010, 08:01 AM   #5
deuce228
Redneck Poser
 
deuce228's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-07-05
Location: West Branch, MI
Posts: 7,971
iTrader: (8)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Doesn't this still have to go through the House?
deuce228 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 3rd, 2010, 08:01 AM   #6
aber61
Senior Member
 
aber61's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-22-08
Location: Commerce Twp. Michigan
Posts: 6,085
iTrader: (3)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesova View Post
is that not a fair retort?
If the people say they do not want it why is it ok for the government to still continue to ram this thing through?
The people need to tell the obama team that if this goes through that thier jobs will be gone. I like the saying YOUR FIRED
aber61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 3rd, 2010, 08:07 AM   #7
pizzaman
Senior Member
 
pizzaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: Independence Twsp, North Oakland County
Posts: 934
iTrader: (3)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesova View Post
is that not a fair retort?
NO it is not.

ps: I saw the dead in 82-83 in Rochester, NY
pizzaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 3rd, 2010, 11:43 AM   #8
RyeBread
Catch the wave
 
RyeBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-08-05
Location: Fenton
Posts: 7,946
iTrader: (2)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesova View Post
is that not a fair retort?
ignore the article much? look at the types of legislation that have been passed using reconciliation compared to what is being threatened by the Obama/Reed camp...

look at the true consensus that previous social legislation was passed with compared to how bitter this debacle is being debated/polled at. while doing that, keep in mind that your liar of a president campaigned on hope and change, on coalition building.

he has demonstrated the absolute worst of chicago style politics instead.


Quote:
Originally Posted by aber61 View Post
If the people say they do not want it why is it ok for the government to still continue to ram this thing through?
The people need to tell the obama team that if this goes through that thier jobs will be gone. I like the saying YOUR FIRED
That's why moderate are resisting, and why Obama is all but sure to push this through reconciliation - the moderates know they will be out of a Job come November if they put any support behind this debacle. As the article states, he is resolutely marching forward and more than willing to sacrifice his party members on the bayonets so to speak.
RyeBread is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 3rd, 2010, 12:46 PM   #9
RyeBread
Catch the wave
 
RyeBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-08-05
Location: Fenton
Posts: 7,946
iTrader: (2)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Oh, and this won't come as a surprise to those of us who have not been blinded by his media blitz back in 2008, but he also has once again gone back on his word:

http://www.breitbart.tv/obama-americ...lus-1-strategy

"DEMS SHOULD NOT PASS HEALTCARE WITH 50-PLUS-1... 'WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE A 60% MAJORITY IN SENATE AND HOUSE TO GET A BILL TO MY DESK'..."
RyeBread is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 3rd, 2010, 12:55 PM   #10
aber61
Senior Member
 
aber61's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-22-08
Location: Commerce Twp. Michigan
Posts: 6,085
iTrader: (3)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Default

We should not be surprised, the man is a liar and will do what ever HE sees fit for himself and Not was is good for the people that put him in his place or the people that didn't.
The party needs to be reminded who put them there and that they can be removed
aber61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 3rd, 2010, 01:04 PM   #11
Cooter
Dad Kickin' It OldSkool
 
Cooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-04-05
Location: Chi-caw-go
Posts: 4,504
iTrader: (16)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyeBread View Post
Oh, and this won't come as a surprise to those of us who have not been blinded by his media blitz back in 2008, but he also has once again gone back on his word:

http://www.breitbart.tv/obama-americ...lus-1-strategy

"DEMS SHOULD NOT PASS HEALTCARE WITH 50-PLUS-1... 'WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE A 60% MAJORITY IN SENATE AND HOUSE TO GET A BILL TO MY DESK'..."
Thank you for that.

I was just talking to a friend two nights ago about all of his lies and promises he went back on. This is one more to add.
__________________
Michigan- The Only Great Lakes State South of the Mason-Dixon Line.
Cooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 3rd, 2010, 08:50 PM   #12
3stratman
Let's Go Red Wings!
 
3stratman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-08
Location: Michigan
Posts: 708
iTrader: (0)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aber61 View Post
I really hope that the ones that voted for this administration are happy with how their vote is turning this country into a socialist state.
Actually, a good number of the "Obamamaniacs" are still convinced that Barry is the greatest thing. Just today at work, I was talking to this woman who was high as hell on him before the elections. I asked her how the Obama thing was working out for her, and she said 'Great". I asked her what she thought was so great about him, and she said he is the hardest working president we've ever had, the smartest, and that he has so much integrity! I about shit when she said it. I asked how she could talk about integrity when his cabinet is full of clowns like Tim Geithner who, as a tremendous tax cheat, got the job as Treasury Secretary, in charge of the IRS, and her response was "So I suppose you think Sarah Palin is intelligent?" At that point I realized there was no use continuing the conversation.
3stratman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 4th, 2010, 06:08 AM   #13
Mr Toes - R.I.P.
November 7, 1958 - July 22, 2011
 
Mr Toes - R.I.P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-29-07
Location: Belleville Mi
Posts: 4,727
iTrader: (1)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3stratman View Post
Actually, a good number of the "Obamamaniacs" are still convinced that Barry is the greatest thing. Just today at work, I was talking to this woman who was high as hell on him before the elections. I asked her how the Obama thing was working out for her, and she said 'Great". I asked her what she thought was so great about him, and she said he is the hardest working president we've ever had, the smartest, and that he has so much integrity! I about shit when she said it. I asked how she could talk about integrity when his cabinet is full of clowns like Tim Geithner who, as a tremendous tax cheat, got the job as Treasury Secretary, in charge of the IRS, and her response was "So I suppose you think Sarah Palin is intelligent?" At that point I realized there was no use continuing the conversation.
My normal response to people who answer that way is. Sarah Palin?????? who is that and what office does she hold????

They usally get all pissed off and say they don't want to talk politic's, translation is Obama Sucks Ass and I don't have a defense for it.
Mr Toes - R.I.P. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest > General 4x4 Stuff > Politics, Government, or Religion Chat

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright 2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Page generated in 0.37534 seconds with 60 queries