Originally Posted by Mikey1258
He introduces bills that(wanted by his constuants) contradict his beliefs, he votes against them because; "They are wrong, and Immoral", and then they pass and he thinks this is an acceptable use of the system.
Isn't that how it's supposed to work? You know, "By the people, for the people." ??
Or are you saying he shouldn't introduce bills, that his voters want, because he disagrees with their view?