Originally Posted by Yetti
I don't suppose you applied for your stint as a ORV rep?
I would hate to see you miss your chance to replace Glen or Dick as their terms expire. who knows you might even get more then 3 minutes to speak at the meetings.
When did the application process begin?
Wasn't this needed search for new opinions supposed to start at least 6 months before
term expired over a year ago? (or possibly more
given the disgustingly poor record of actually installing these applicants that nobody but seemingly myself has ever complained about?).
What many (and I don't count you in here, Yetti) don't understand, is the following;
When you allow
the state to so cavalierly trash these appointments (let alone allow them to structure this board differently from the sledder board in the first place) you set a precedent that will indeed bite you (us) right in the arse someday when somebody worse
than "God" (help us) is installed perpetually and their multiple expired term is covered up and manipulated in the same manner as we've unbelievably witnessed to date.
Today, we're saddled with a guy up there insisting that the manufacturers by gosh
build their machines to whatever standard he dreams up at the moment with the guy beside hiom insisting that the NOHVCC or the CPSC damn well
look into it....yet what in the heck pray tell are the "what iffers" of tomorrow capable of...and especially
when they're hand-picked by the damn DNR!
want to find out what 'precedence' morphs into on down the line in these governmental relations....when we already
have 'leaders' standing up and spewing this kind of garbage without so much as a 'peep' from anyone?
I think our kids deserve better and it's a shame that nobody has the guts to say so regarding even the simplest
of these procedural matters.