Originally Posted by L4CX
I'm all for the extra legislation if it brings both sides the best option. I realize that it would be alot of work even changing the law to say "insert alternative here" but I think that would be best for both.
I would be curious to see how many homosexual couples would be fine with that. IMO, if they are insistent about it being called a marriage then there is more to it then just wanting benefits that hetero spouses have. It's a political statement and falls under Bruce's thinking.
How about you and the people who hold those views pay 100% for the extra costs. Choices should have consequences.