Originally Posted by Brods
What about #5? Sounds like a great idea and I was going to vote yes, butů
exposes a downside to the prop. Cliff notes: A small group (only 13 senators) could effectively block attempts to close tax loop holes or other tax changes which are beneficial to the people but hurt the special interests.
Everyone seems to be distorting the facts so what/who to believe?
My whole thought on the bridge is, if it makes enough money for the owner to sponsor a ballot proposal and do prime time advertising, it is probably a fabulous investment.
If it wasn't going to be a huge moneymaker and cut into his obviously massive profits, why would he be putting up such a fight