Originally Posted by brewmenn
Yes, you may be right and if so I apologize.
But he does the same thing in his statement, assuming that every woman on welfare with a bunch of kids is in that predicament because she couldn't keep her legs closed.
I found that rather ironic.
First... I do think your comment was in poor taste, but I say that recognizing I was being a bit of a jerk to you. That being said...
I made no insinuation that every woman receiving aid is in their particular predicament because they couldnt keep their legs closed. You made that connection yourself. I was merely making a point that once people get on the aid programs, there is no deterrent to adding mouths to feed to the program. Exactly the same way we can not deny benefits based on drug testing, because there isnt any.