Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest - View Single Post - California grossly miscalculated pollution levels in a scientific analysis used to to
View Single Post
Old October 9th, 2010, 10:52 AM   #7
Catch the wave
RyeBread's Avatar
Join Date: 11-08-05
Location: Fenton
Posts: 7,990
iTrader: (2)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)

Originally Posted by clarkstoncracker View Post
Ok, now I know I'm going to sound like a liberal right now, but isn't it kind of a good thing that all these manuf's were forced to meet this new law? Don't we have much cleaner running diesels now?
define cleaner running? most people equate particulates with pollution - because it looks dirty... these same people think nothing of tossing their half-smoked cigarette out the window...

climate-change, cap+trade, etc., etc. are all nothing more than taxes and in reality do very little if anything to actually protect the environment.

there was a special on discovery this morning - speaking of the progression of seeding storm clouds' technology. under the presumable goal of minimizing weather related damage to human property/population centers.

we have such a primitive understanding of weather/climate that we don't even know how naive we are with these attempts. blindly marching forward with ideas such as wave-action sea-water pumps with the intention of cooling off ocean surface waters in order to help minimize hurricane damages - instead of pausing to wonder what other issues may arise by trying to play God - or simply forcing the market to bear the costs associated with building/developing in hazard prone areas. (The outer banks are admitedly beautiful locations when the weather is nice, but why should I have to offset your losses, or accept possible climate/fisheries implications because you build on a fucking island 3 miles from the mainland, 3' above the mean ocean level and be surprised that your junk gets whacked during hurricane season?!)

as for pollution - my wife frequently jokes that she'd enjoy water skiing more, if the lakes were chlorinated or otherwise dead/sterile

Last edited by RyeBread; October 9th, 2010 at 10:56 AM.
RyeBread is offline   Reply With Quote
Page generated in 0.15548 seconds with 22 queries