It is the best timeline I could find on a quick search.
And regardless of the details, how is it biased to point out that 2 Republican administrations worked on NAFTA before Clinton even took office. How is it biased to point out that NAFTA was in place before Clinton took office. How is it biased to use the facts to contradict a statement implying that Clinton is solely responsible for NAFTA.
That is what my post was about.....not to debate the virtues, or lack there of, of NAFTA.
ANyway you spin it, NAFTA is still the brainchild of a Republican Presidential Candidate (Ronald Reagan), was pursued by his administration. And then the torch was carried on by the next Republican administration (Bush sr.).