View Single Post
Old February 24th, 2010, 06:01 PM   #18
mdhmi
Senior Member
 
mdhmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-08-07
Location: West Side
Posts: 272
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Verbalkint99 View Post
wasn't he ordered to pay the 79k because of loans and donations in the past?
Yes, the court felt that those "loans" were "income".

Paying with anonymous money orders sounds shady as hell!
mdhmi is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.03361 seconds with 11 queries