View Single Post
Old February 24th, 2010, 06:01 PM   #18
Senior Member
mdhmi's Avatar
Join Date: 03-08-07
Location: West Side
Posts: 272
iTrader: (0)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)

Originally Posted by Verbalkint99 View Post
wasn't he ordered to pay the 79k because of loans and donations in the past?
Yes, the court felt that those "loans" were "income".

Paying with anonymous money orders sounds shady as hell!
mdhmi is offline   Reply With Quote
Page generated in 0.05408 seconds with 11 queries