Originally Posted by L4CX
Now, the question I have is this: If the majority of his state still supports Government Health care (Remember this is Hypothetical) wouldn't it still be his Responsibility to push for health care? If it is, and he doesn't, the system would still be failing even though it means an outcome in our (people against health care, AKA: most of us) favor. So would that make us happy that the system failed in this instance but not in another?
I would have to think that if the majority of his state wants the healthcare bill they wouldnt vote in a guy who has vowed to vote against it