Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest - View Single Post - Stimulating! Ten New Congressional Districts in Michigan!
View Single Post
Old November 18th, 2009, 05:46 PM   #1
XXXJ
Desert Rat
 
XXXJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-09-07
Location: Memphis, Mi
Posts: 5,657
iTrader: (13)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Default Stimulating! Ten New Congressional Districts in Michigan!

http://www.mackinac.org/article.aspx?ID=11365

Quote:
My colleagues at Watchdog.org and its state-level affiliates were the first in the nation to break the story that the $787 billion federal stimulus package "has doubled the size of the House of Representatives, according to Recovery.gov, which says that funds were distributed to 440 congressional districts that do not exist."
This includes Michigan. In its first installment of promised quarterly online reports, Recovery.gov lists 10 new districts to the Great Lake State's phalanx of 15 U.S. House seats (the center column, by the way, is the number of "new jobs" reported):

31st congressional district 0
$1,650,890
00 congressional district 26
$880,855
21st congressional district 17
$810,000
22nd congressional district 0
$722,192
16th congressional district 1.5
$465,898
28th congressional district 0
$418,186
23rd congressional district 2
$214,843
83rd congressional district 1
$156,820
60th congressional district
$56,328
37th congressional district 2
$11,933


Interestingly, a closer look at the stimulus awards in these non-existent congressional districts (see spreadsheet here) includes a community policing grant of $29,507 for the city of Midland, in congressional district "00." Midland is home to the Mackinac Center, whose office building is within a stone's throw of the district headquarters of Congressman Dave Camp. Rep. Camp serves Michigan's 4th Congressional district. Stimulus awards totaling more than $810,000 reported in the "21st" district were given to recipients in Mount Pleasant, Alma and Shepherd, cities which are also technically in Rep. Camp's district. (Incidentally, one person representing more than one congressional district may be a constitutionally questionable practice.)
"I guess we know why Michigan's unemployment rate is going up despite all these claims of new jobs. They're being created out of thin air," said Camp's spokesman, Sage Eastman.
Judging by some of the comments included by the local-level folks, inputting this information was not easy, many getting their reporting instructions at the last minute. Writes one seemingly frustrated award recipient in Rapid River:
"Impossible registration process. Unable to reach help desk in less than 2 hours, registration process ultimately took an extra week to accomplish."
And this entry from a recipient in Sand Lake:
"Process to register was not clear. We did not even know we received ARRA funds until October 7, 2009. Each registration area required 24 - 48 hours to activate. This entire process is convoluted and should have been a seamless process. Had some type of notification been sent when the funds were awarded the report would not have been late. There were many technical error(s) with the registration process."
According to Watchdog.org, the federal recovery Web site operates on an $84 million budget. One would think such hefty price tag would ensure more accurate reporting. Instead, it says nearly $6.4 billion was used to "create or save" fewer than 30,000 jobs in these 440 "phantom" congressional districts. That's almost $225,000 per job.
Just don't tell us we need to fill those congressional seats.
XXXJ is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.11405 seconds with 20 queries