Great Lakes 4x4. The largest offroad forum in the Midwest - View Single Post - WhiteRhino's Latest Mods
View Single Post
Old April 22nd, 2008, 06:46 AM   #27
95geo
newbie
 
95geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-05
Location: dryden
Posts: 5,777
iTrader: (6)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dodger889 View Post
The enginner on this job failed on thing vertical weld should have plating to give it a little more strenght due to flexing that will cause breakage around the joints of welding. But then what do I know been around the blocks a few time and have seen a few broken frames...
you're so cool and trendy, you used "failed"

so, lets go into your superior intelligence on frames..... this picture is what it replaces, just for reference.....



the existing frame is what, .100" thick? 2.5x4 box section with no welds in that area. The new frame is .120" wall 2x4 box that has been butt welded and welded flat off the vehicle, not vertical and that just so happens to be the worst weld on the truck and it was not ground down to cover it up to sacrifice strength.

There is no internal bracing except where it splices into the stock frame. what you dont see is the fact that the b and c hoops on the cage are also tied into the frame. The angle on the joint is flat enough that pulling it apart at one end is highly unlikely even though it doesnt have fishy plates anywhere on it and it doesnt meet your e-engineering approval.

If it ever shows signs of failure I'll be sure to post up and admit you were correct, until then, just remember not everything needs to be built 5 times stronger than it needs to be.
95geo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.06785 seconds with 20 queries