Quote:
Originally Posted by albersondh
You’re linear and my linear are different in context, your terms and my terms are different expressions. This is becoming a semantics thing. Can you tell me that my formula will not yield accurate MPH, or do you just not like the way I go about getting to the answer? Im sure toy87 has benefited greatly from this discussion. You’re obviously an expert on this particular subject matter. Should I stop using my formula because it yields inaccurate MPH results?
|
Hahaha, you are new here. You'll learn I'm an expert on all particular subject matters.
Its not my term vs your term. Its The correct term (mine) versus the wrong term (yours).
Now, about your formula:
Here's your formula:
MPH = (Engine RPM x Tire dia x 0.003 / tranny gear ratio x t-case ratio x diff ratio).
Yes, that tells your mph based on your engine speed and gear.
but why go through that convoluted equation?
Actual MPH = Read MPH * old tire size/new tire size.
See how much easier that is?
Thats called a LINEAR equation.
If you push in the clutch in your truck, does the speedo drop? No. Push in the clutch in your equation....
The equation you posted is correct, but you are using it in the wrong context. That is a decent equation to know in your head, if you need to look at your engine RPM and figure out how fast you are going, though. I've used that in trucks without a speedo.
Going back to the original question, typically, you had a 225/75R15 on these trucks. Now you've gone to a 31x10.5.
A 225/75/R15 is ~28.5" tall
A 31x10.5R15 is ~30.7" tall
If you did the math that way, for, say 60 mph, you'd get:
Actual MPH = 60mph *(30.7/28.5)
Actual PM = 64.6 mph
So, being ~5mph sounds right.
Me, I prefer, when possible, to use the revs/ mile of a specific tire, especially going between metric and inch sizes, because of the variation is size vs labelling.
So, using that way, it'd be:
Actual = 60mph (731/676)
Actual = 64.88 mph
at 30 mph:
Actual = 30mph (731/676)
Actual = 32.44 mph
etc....